Rodgers A, Sage D, Futter M, MacMahon S
Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996 Feb;24(1):79-86. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9602400114.
A survey was conducted among 259 New Zealand specialist anaesthetists to assess attitudes and practices with regard to epidural or subarachnoid anaesthesia (ESA). Ninety-four per cent replied and virtually all of the respondents indicated that they performed ESA at some time. ESA was used by most anaesthetists for most patients undergoing major hip or knee surgery, abdomino-perineal resection, cystectomy, caesarean section or transurethral resection of the prostate, ESA was used is about half of patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, femoro-popliteal bypass or thoracotomy and there was marked variation between anaesthetists in the frequency of using ESA for these procedures. There was broad consensus about the importance of a number of factors that might influence the decision to employ ESA; in particular that systemic sepsis and prolonged bleeding time were important contraindications and that patient preference and chronic lung disease were important indications. However respondents were equally divided as to whether they felt that recent myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure constituted indications or contraindications to ESA.
对259名新西兰麻醉科专科医生进行了一项调查,以评估他们对硬膜外或蛛网膜下腔麻醉(ESA)的态度和操作情况。94%的人进行了回复,几乎所有受访者都表示他们曾在某些时候实施过ESA。大多数麻醉医生对大多数接受髋关节或膝关节大手术、腹会阴切除术、膀胱切除术、剖宫产或经尿道前列腺切除术的患者使用ESA;约一半接受腹主动脉瘤修复术、股腘动脉搭桥术或开胸手术的患者使用ESA,并且麻醉医生在这些手术中使用ESA的频率存在显著差异。对于一些可能影响采用ESA决策的因素的重要性,存在广泛共识;特别是全身性脓毒症和延长的出血时间是重要的禁忌症,而患者偏好和慢性肺病是重要的适应症。然而,对于近期心肌梗死或充血性心力衰竭是ESA的适应症还是禁忌症,受访者的意见平分秋色。