Atwill E R, Mohammed H O, Lopez J W, McCulloch C E, Dubovi E J
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Plant Breeding and Biometry, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Am J Vet Res. 1996 Mar;57(3):278-85.
To locate counties within New York state with a high seroprevalence among the equine population, to determine host, management, and environmental factors that were associated with seropositivity to Ehrlichia risticii, and to determine evidence for arthropod- or helminth-mediated transmission of E risticii to horses.
Cross-sectional study.
A random sample of 3,000 of the 39,000 equine operations in New York state was selected, and 2,587 horses from 511 operations were tested.
Blood samples were collected from horses and tested for seropositivity, using the indirect fluorescent antibody technique. Data on each horse and each farm's management were obtained by personal interview. The significance of each factor on the risk of seropositivity was evaluated, using mixed-effect logistic regression.
The seroprevalence among E risticii-nonvaccinated horses was 7.3%. The county-specific seroprevalence ranged from 0 to 27%, with higher-risk counties located at low elevation. Farms at higher risk for having seropositive horses were located predominately at low elevation with no bodies of water nearby. Risk of seropositivity was associated with time spent in a stall or run-in shed, with frequency of application of fly spray, and, depending on duration of residency at the farm, with frequency of deworming with benzimidazole and pyrantel. Standardbreds were 2 to 3 times more likely to have been exposed, compared with Thoroughbreds. Depending on duration of residency at the farm, male and middle-age horses were at higher risk. Up to 32% of the variance for a horse to test seropositive for E risticii on the logit scale was attributable to farm-level random effects, but the nested social group random effect was not significant.
Arthropods and helminths may have a role in the transmission of this disease. Several management factors may directly or indirectly modify the risk of exposure to E risticii, allowing for the possibility of additional control measures besides traditional vaccination strategies.
在纽约州的各县找出马群中血清阳性率高的地区,确定与瑞氏埃立克体血清阳性相关的宿主、管理和环境因素,并确定节肢动物或蠕虫介导的瑞氏埃立克体传播给马的证据。
横断面研究。
从纽约州39000个养马场中随机抽取3000个,对来自511个养马场的2587匹马进行检测。
采集马的血样,采用间接荧光抗体技术检测血清阳性情况。通过个人访谈获取每匹马和每个农场管理的相关数据。使用混合效应逻辑回归评估每个因素对血清阳性风险的影响。
未接种瑞氏埃立克体疫苗的马的血清阳性率为7.3%。各县的血清阳性率在0%至27%之间,高风险县位于低海拔地区。马血清呈阳性风险较高的农场主要位于低海拔地区,附近没有水体。血清阳性风险与在厩舍或敞棚中停留的时间、喷洒驱虫剂的频率有关,并且根据在农场的居住时间,还与使用苯并咪唑和噻嘧啶驱虫的频率有关。与纯种马相比,标准赛马暴露的可能性高2至3倍。根据在农场的居住时间,公马和中年马的风险更高。在logit尺度上,一匹马检测出瑞氏埃立克体血清呈阳性的差异中,高达32%可归因于农场层面的随机效应,但嵌套社会群体随机效应不显著。
节肢动物和蠕虫可能在这种疾病的传播中起作用。几个管理因素可能直接或间接改变接触瑞氏埃立克体的风险,除了传统的疫苗接种策略外,还可能采取其他控制措施。