Suppr超能文献

1986 - 1990年瑞典“可避免”死亡率的社会经济差异。

Socioeconomic differences in 'avoidable' mortality in Sweden 1986-1990.

作者信息

Westerling R, Gullberg A, Rosén M

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Jun;25(3):560-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.3.560.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

'Avoidable' mortality is commonly studied as an indicator of the outcome of health care. In this study socioeconomic differences in avoidable mortality in Sweden from 1986 to 1990 are analysed and related methodological issues discussed.

METHODS

The 1985 Swedish Population and Housing Census was linked to the National Cause of Death Register 1986-1990. Mortality from potentially 'avoidable' causes of death was analysed for the age group 21-64 years. Analyses were performed for different socioeconomic groups, blue-collar workers, white-collar workers and the self-employed as well as for individuals outside the labour market. Standardized Mortality Ratios were calculated using standardization by age and sex.

RESULTS

For all indicators studied, the death rates for those not in work were higher than for people at work. The largest differences were found for chronic bronchitis, diabetes, bacterial meningitis, ulcer of the stomach and duodenum, chronic rheumatic heart disease, asthma and hypertensive and cerebrovascular disease. For these causes of death the risk of dying was between 3.1 and 7.5 times greater in the non-working population than in the work-force. The differences in avoidable mortality between blue-collar workers and white-collar workers and the self-employed were, however, much smaller. For most of the indicators no significant differences were found. For ulcers of the stomach and duodenum, however the death rate for blue-collar workers was 2.8 times higher than those for other categories in work.

CONCLUSIONS

The small difference in mortality outcome for different socioeconomic groups within the work-force indicates an equal quality of care for these groups. The greatly increased risk among the non-working population, however, is a warning sign. These results may be due to a 'healthy worker' effect. The measurement of socioeconomic differences in mortality may be dependent on the time-period chosen between occupational exposure and mortality outcome.

摘要

背景

“可避免的”死亡率通常作为医疗保健结果的一项指标进行研究。本研究分析了1986年至1990年瑞典可避免死亡率方面的社会经济差异,并讨论了相关的方法学问题。

方法

将1985年瑞典人口与住房普查数据与1986 - 1990年国家死亡原因登记册相联系。对21至64岁年龄组中潜在“可避免”死因导致的死亡率进行分析。针对不同社会经济群体(蓝领工人、白领工人、个体经营者)以及劳动力市场以外的个体进行了分析。使用年龄和性别标准化方法计算标准化死亡率。

结果

对于所研究的所有指标,未就业者的死亡率高于就业者。在慢性支气管炎、糖尿病、细菌性脑膜炎、胃和十二指肠溃疡、慢性风湿性心脏病、哮喘以及高血压和脑血管疾病方面发现的差异最大。对于这些死因,非就业人群的死亡风险比劳动力人群高3.1至7.5倍。然而,蓝领工人、白领工人和个体经营者之间在可避免死亡率方面的差异要小得多。对于大多数指标,未发现显著差异。不过,对于胃和十二指肠溃疡,蓝领工人的死亡率比其他就业类别高2.8倍。

结论

劳动力中不同社会经济群体在死亡率结果上的微小差异表明这些群体得到了同等质量的护理。然而,非就业人群中风险大幅增加是一个警示信号。这些结果可能归因于“健康工人”效应。死亡率方面社会经济差异的衡量可能取决于职业暴露与死亡率结果之间所选的时间段。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验