Suppr超能文献

在儿科急诊科镇静方面,肌肉注射氯胺酮优于哌替啶、异丙嗪和氯丙嗪。

Intramuscular ketamine is superior to meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine for pediatric emergency department sedation.

作者信息

Petrack E M, Marx C M, Wright M S

机构信息

Rainbow Babies and Childrens Hospital, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Jul;150(7):676-81. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170320022003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare ketamine hydrochloride (KET) with combined meperidine hydrochloride, promethazine hydrochloride, and chlorpromazine hydrochloride (MPC) for pediatric emergency department sedation with respect to onset, duration, and efficacy.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

SETTING

Pediatric emergency department in an urban university hospital.

PATIENTS

Convenience sample of 29 patients, 6 months to 6 years of age, requiring sedation for suturing, wound or burn debridement, or lumbar puncture.

INTERVENTION

Children received intramuscular KET (4 mg/kg) with atropine sulfate (0.01 mg/kg) or MPC (meperidine hydrochloride 2 mg/kg, promethazine hydrochloride 1 mg/kg, chlorpromazine hydrochloride 1 mg/kg). Data collection included demographics, vital signs, and onset of sedation; procedural distress using the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress; and time to recovery. The operator was questioned on satisfaction with the drug, and parents received follow-up to assess parental satisfaction.

RESULTS

Of the 29 patients enrolled in the study, 2 were excluded for protocol violation, 15 received KET, and 12 received MPC. Demographics and baseline vital signs did not differ. Although patients in the 2 groups had a similar duration of sedation (KET, 82 min vs MPC, 97 min, P = .15), patients receiving KET had more rapid onset of sedation (3 min vs 18 min, P < .01) a shorter time to discharge (85 min vs 113 min, P 0 .01) and lower Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress scores (9.9 vs 19.2, P = .003). All 15 physicians using KET would request it again vs 5 of 12 (42%) of the physicians using MPC (P < .001). No serious adverse reactions occurred. There were no differences in parental satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Ketamine has a faster onset and results in more rapid discharge from the pediatric emergency department while providing for less patient distress during procedures. Ketamine is also associated with greater physician satisfaction than MPC.

摘要

目的

比较盐酸氯胺酮(KET)与盐酸哌替啶、盐酸异丙嗪和盐酸氯丙嗪联合用药(MPC)在儿科急诊科用于镇静时的起效时间、持续时间和疗效。

设计

前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验。

地点

城市大学医院的儿科急诊科。

患者

选取29例年龄在6个月至6岁之间、因缝合、伤口或烧伤清创或腰椎穿刺需要镇静的患儿作为便利样本。

干预措施

儿童接受肌肉注射KET(4mg/kg)加硫酸阿托品(0.01mg/kg)或MPC(盐酸哌替啶2mg/kg、盐酸异丙嗪1mg/kg、盐酸氯丙嗪1mg/kg)。数据收集包括人口统计学资料、生命体征和镇静起效时间;使用行为痛苦观察量表评估操作过程中的痛苦程度;以及恢复时间。询问操作人员对药物的满意度,并对家长进行随访以评估家长满意度。

结果

本研究纳入的29例患者中,2例因违反方案被排除,15例接受KET治疗,12例接受MPC治疗。人口统计学资料和基线生命体征无差异。尽管两组患者的镇静持续时间相似(KET组为82分钟,MPC组为97分钟,P = 0.15),但接受KET治疗的患者镇静起效更快(3分钟对18分钟,P < 0.01),出院时间更短(85分钟对113分钟,P = 0.01),行为痛苦观察量表得分更低(9.9对19.2,P = 0.003)。使用KET的15名医生均表示会再次要求使用该药,而使用MPC的12名医生中有5名(42%)会再次要求使用(P < 0.001)。未发生严重不良反应。家长满意度无差异。

结论

氯胺酮起效更快,可使患儿更快从儿科急诊科出院,同时在操作过程中给患儿带来的痛苦更少。与MPC相比,氯胺酮也使医生满意度更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验