Coburn T J, Miller W V, Parrill W D
Transfusion. 1977 May-Jun;17(3):265-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1977.17377196363.x.
Sampling techniques were studied for the determination of the hemoglobin in volunteer blood donors. First, finger, ear, and venous samples were collected from 50 volunteers. Then five volunteers were monitored for a three-day period and finger, ear, and venous samples were collected daily. Thirdly, microhematocrits were done on the postdonation EDTA samples of 500 donors who had been screened using ear puncture copper sulfate hemoglobin estimations. Fourth, 25,437 donations were followed up to see whether capillary sampling techniques affected the rate of donor deferral. And finally, the ear sampling technique was varied using vigorous rubbing and manipulation to see if there was abnormal circulation that would affect the hematocrit results from capillary blood from the ear. We found that the microhematocrits averaged 7 per cent higher from blood obtained from ear puncture than from either finger puncture or venous puncture. Microhematocrits obtained from blood obtained by ear puncture were less accurate and less precise than blood from finger punctures. Finger puncture samples exclude approximately 6 per cent more donors than does blood from ear punctures.
对志愿献血者血红蛋白测定的采样技术进行了研究。首先,从50名志愿者身上采集手指、耳部和静脉血样。然后,对5名志愿者进行为期三天的监测,每天采集手指、耳部和静脉血样。第三,对500名经耳部穿刺硫酸铜血红蛋白估计筛查的献血者的献血后乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)血样进行微量血细胞比容测定。第四,对25437次献血进行随访,以观察毛细血管采样技术是否会影响献血者延期献血率。最后,通过大力摩擦和操作改变耳部采样技术,以查看是否存在异常循环,从而影响耳部毛细血管血的血细胞比容结果。我们发现,耳部穿刺采集的血液所测得的微量血细胞比容平均值比手指穿刺或静脉穿刺采集的血液高出约7%。耳部穿刺采集的血液所测得的微量血细胞比容比手指穿刺采集的血液准确性更低、精密度更差。手指穿刺样本比耳部穿刺血液排除的献血者约多6%。