Suppr超能文献

硝苯地平单独使用以及与地尔硫䓬或维拉帕米联合使用治疗高血压的比较。

Comparison of nifedipine alone and with diltiazem or verapamil in hypertension.

作者信息

Saseen J J, Carter B L, Brown T E, Elliott W J, Black H R

机构信息

University of Colorado Health Science Center, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Denver, Colo 80262, USA.

出版信息

Hypertension. 1996 Jul;28(1):109-14. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.28.1.109.

Abstract

Receptor binding studies suggest that combinations of calcium channel blockers may result in either enhanced or diminished pharmacological effects, but clinical data in hypertension are incomplete. In this study, we compared blood pressure reductions using nifedipine alone, nifedipine plus diltiazem, and nifedipine plus verapamil and determined whether combinations alter nifedipine pharmacokinetics. After determination of baseline blood pressures. 16 subjects with essential hypertension (12 men, 4 women; mean age, 48 years) received 30 mg/d open-label, sustained release nifedipine for 2 weeks. If still hypertensive (n = 16), they were randomized (double-blind) to receive either additional sustained release diltiazem or sustained release verapamil, both 180 mg/d, for 2 weeks and were then crossed-over for the final 2 weeks of the study. All medications were once-daily, extended-release formulations. Blood pressures and nifedipine plasma concentrations were measured during the final day of each treatment. Overall, each combination lowered mean systolic and diastolic pressures more than nifedipine alone. Mean supine diastolic pressures were significantly lower at 8 hours (77.6 versus 84.6 mm Hg, P = .001) and 12 hours (81.5 versus 87.1 mm Hg, P = .04) with nifedipine plus diltiazem than nifedipine plus verapamil. Mean nifedipine concentrations were inversely correlated with mean blood pressures. Mean nifedipine area under the curve values were greater with diltiazem than verapamil (1430 versus 1134 ng.h/mL, P = .026), with each greater than nifedipine alone (957 ng.h/mL). Nifedipine plus diltiazem had a greater antihypertensive effect than nifedipine plus verapamil. Diltiazem caused greater increases in nifedipine plasma concentrations than did verapamil. These data suggest that combined calcium channel blockers result in additive antihypertensive effects, perhaps because of a pharmacokinetic interaction.

摘要

受体结合研究表明,钙通道阻滞剂联合使用可能会增强或减弱药理作用,但高血压方面的临床数据并不完整。在本研究中,我们比较了单独使用硝苯地平、硝苯地平加地尔硫䓬以及硝苯地平加维拉帕米时的血压降低情况,并确定联合用药是否会改变硝苯地平的药代动力学。在测定基线血压后,16名原发性高血压患者(12名男性,4名女性;平均年龄48岁)接受30mg/d的开放标签缓释硝苯地平治疗2周。如果仍为高血压患者(n = 16),则将他们随机(双盲)分为两组,一组额外接受180mg/d的缓释地尔硫䓬治疗,另一组接受180mg/d的缓释维拉帕米治疗,为期2周,然后在研究的最后2周进行交叉治疗。所有药物均为每日一次的缓释制剂。在每种治疗的最后一天测量血压和硝苯地平血浆浓度。总体而言,每种联合用药降低平均收缩压和舒张压的幅度均大于单独使用硝苯地平。硝苯地平加地尔硫䓬组在8小时(77.6对84.6mmHg,P = 0.001)和12小时(81.5对87.1mmHg,P = 0.04)时的平均仰卧位舒张压显著低于硝苯地平加维拉帕米组。硝苯地平平均浓度与平均血压呈负相关。地尔硫䓬组硝苯地平曲线下面积值大于维拉帕米组(1430对1134ng·h/mL,P = 0.026),两者均大于单独使用硝苯地平组(957ng·h/mL)。硝苯地平加地尔硫䓬的降压效果优于硝苯地平加维拉帕米。地尔硫䓬使硝苯地平血浆浓度升高的幅度大于维拉帕米。这些数据表明,联合使用钙通道阻滞剂可产生相加的降压作用,这可能是由于药代动力学相互作用所致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验