Sklar A H, Riesenberg L A, Ur Rehman A, Smith S, Rivera-Padilla H
Department of Medicine, Wilson Memorial Regional Medical Center, Johnson City, NY, USA.
Int J Artif Organs. 1996 Mar;19(3):164-9.
Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) rises disproportionately to serum creatinine in patients with prerenal azotemia whether due to impaired hemodynamics or excessive ureagenesis. To determine whether urinary urea nitrogen excretion rates can distinguish between these caused of hyperuremia we performed a cross-sectional observational study to compare urinary urea nitrogen excretion rates in a highly selected group of patients with prerenal azotemia. Patients who had stable serum creatinine levels, BUN: serum creatinine ratios exceeding 20:1, and progressive azotemia were identified from the hospital laboratory data base. Using conventional clinicolaboratory criteria, 27 patients were diagnosed with either renal hypoperfusion (group I; n = 17) or hyperureagenesis ((group II; n = 10). Random urine sampling for electrolytes, osmolality, creatinine, and urea nitrogen was followed by 24 h collection for creatinine clearance and urinary urea nitrogen. There were no significant differences in age, gender, absolute levels of BUN, or BUN: serum creatinine ratios between the groups. Creatinine clearance (ml/min/1.73 m2) (ml/s/1.73 m2) was lower in group I than in group II (21 +/- 16 vs 36 +/- 13; p < 0.05) (0.35 +/- 0.27 vs 0.60 +/- 0.22; p < 0.05). Twenty-four hour urinary urea nitrogen levels were significantly different (group I, 4.8 +/- 2.9 vs. group II, 13.6 +/- 3.2 gm; p < 0.001) (group I, 171 +/- 300 vs. group II, 486 +/- 114 mmol; p < 0.001). Random urine urea excretion indices were less discriminating but nevertheless still capable of separating the groups. Timed as well as random urine urea nitrogen determinations may assist in differentiating prerenal azotemia due to renal hypoperfusion from hyperureagenesis. Differentiation of these causes of prerenal azotemia might prevent iatrogenic overhydration of patients with azotemia incorrectly attributed to hemodynamic disturbances.
无论是由于血流动力学受损还是尿素生成过多,肾前性氮质血症患者的血尿素氮(BUN)升高幅度与血清肌酐不成比例。为了确定尿尿素氮排泄率是否能区分这些导致血尿素升高的原因,我们进行了一项横断面观察性研究,以比较一组经过高度筛选的肾前性氮质血症患者的尿尿素氮排泄率。从医院实验室数据库中识别出血清肌酐水平稳定、BUN:血清肌酐比值超过20:1且有进行性氮质血症的患者。根据传统的临床实验室标准,27例患者被诊断为肾灌注不足(I组;n = 若使用常规的临床实验室标准,27例患者被诊断为肾灌注不足(I组;n = 17)或尿素生成过多(II组;n = 10)。随机采集尿液样本检测电解质、渗透压、肌酐和尿素氮,随后收集24小时尿液以测定肌酐清除率和尿尿素氮。两组患者在年龄、性别、BUN绝对水平或BUN:血清肌酐比值方面无显著差异。I组的肌酐清除率(ml/min/1.73 m2)(ml/s/1.73 m2)低于II组(21±16 vs 36±13;p < 0.05)(0.35±0.27 vs 0.60±0.22;p < 0.05)。24小时尿尿素氮水平有显著差异(I组,4.8±2.9 vs. II组,13.6±3.2 g;p < 0.001)(I组,171±300 vs. II组,486±114 mmol;p < 0.001)。随机尿尿素排泄指数的鉴别能力较差,但仍能区分两组。定时及随机尿尿素氮测定可能有助于区分因肾灌注不足引起的肾前性氮质血症和尿素生成过多。区分这些肾前性氮质血症的病因可能会防止将因血流动力学紊乱错误归因的氮质血症患者医源性过度水化。 17)或尿素生成过多(II组;n = 10)。随机采集尿液样本检测电解质、渗透压、肌酐和尿素氮,随后收集24小时尿液以测定肌酐清除率和尿尿素氮。两组患者在年龄、性别、BUN绝对水平或BUN:血清肌酐比值方面无显著差异。I组的肌酐清除率(ml/min/1.73 m2)(ml/s/1.73 m2)低于II组(21±16 vs 36±13;p < 0.05)(0.35±0.27 vs 0.60±0.22;p < 0.05)。24小时尿尿素氮水平有显著差异(I组,4.8±2.9 vs. II组,13.6±3.2 g;p < 0.001)(I组,171±300 vs. II组,486±114 mmol;p < 0.001)。随机尿尿素排泄指数的鉴别能力较差,但仍能区分两组。定时及随机尿尿素氮测定可能有助于区分因肾灌注不足引起的肾前性氮质血症和尿素生成过多。区分这些肾前性氮质血症的病因可能会防止将因血流动力学紊乱错误归因的氮质血症患者医源性过度水化。