Kishon-Rabin L, Boothroyd A, Hanin L
Graduate School, City University of New York, New York 10036, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Jul;100(1):593-602. doi: 10.1121/1.415885.
In two experiments, subjects repeated video-recorded sentences presented via speechreading with and without enhancement by a sensory input derived from the acoustic speech signal. Enhancement was measured as percentage increase in recognized words. In experiment 1, tactile presentation of fundamental frequency (F0) provided, after training, for three of four postlingually deafened adults a mean enhancement of 11%. In experiment 2, using six hearing adults, the auditory presentation of F0 provided a mean enhancement of 50%. This value fell, but only to 37%, when the F0 signal was derived from the processor of the tactile aid used in experiment 1. From these experiments it can be concluded that the unexpectedly small enhancement found in experiment 1 is probably due both to the fact that this tactile aid was not providing effective access to all of the information available in the F0 contour and to limitations related to the tactile processing ability of the kinaesthetic system.
在两项实验中,受试者重复观看通过唇读呈现的视频录制句子,这些句子有无来自声学语音信号的感官输入增强。增强程度以识别单词的百分比增加来衡量。在实验1中,经过训练后,为四名语后聋成年人中的三名提供基频(F0)的触觉呈现,平均增强了11%。在实验2中,使用六名听力正常的成年人,F0的听觉呈现平均增强了50%。当F0信号来自实验1中使用的触觉辅助设备的处理器时,该值下降,但仅降至37%。从这些实验可以得出结论,实验1中发现的出乎意料的小增强可能既是因为这种触觉辅助设备没有提供对F0轮廓中所有可用信息的有效访问,也是因为与动觉系统的触觉处理能力相关的限制。