• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机构与研究团队合作:对人类领地性的探索。

Agency and research team co-operation: an exploration of human territoriality.

作者信息

Ervin N E, Dawkins C E

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Mental Health and Administrative Nursing, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago 60612, USA.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 1996 Apr;23(4):728-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00044.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00044.x
PMID:8675890
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to alert researchers and agency staff to potential conflicts that may arise during research projects conducted in busy community-based agencies. Within a framework of human territoriality, key factors in avoiding such conflicts are explored. Territoriality is the defence against intruders of an area of land which is considered to be owned. For humans, something owned includes space, objects, ideas, privileges or rights. Key territoriality concepts explored in the paper are: the private domain, encompassing a privacy retreat and personal space; and the public arena which includes psychological space and action territory. Examples of violation of the types of territory are examined and suggestions for prevention of conflicts are provided.

摘要

本文旨在提醒研究人员和机构工作人员,在繁忙的社区机构开展研究项目期间可能出现的潜在冲突。在人类领地性的框架内,探讨了避免此类冲突的关键因素。领地性是指对被视为拥有的一片土地抵御入侵者。对人类而言,拥有的东西包括空间、物品、想法、特权或权利。本文探讨的关键领地性概念有:私人领域,包括隐私静居处和个人空间;以及公共领域,包括心理空间和行动领地。文中审视了侵犯各类领地的例子,并提供了预防冲突的建议。

相似文献

1
Agency and research team co-operation: an exploration of human territoriality.机构与研究团队合作:对人类领地性的探索。
J Adv Nurs. 1996 Apr;23(4):728-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00044.x.
2
[The researcher in a tight space: between patients and nursing personnel].[狭小空间中的研究者:介于患者与护理人员之间]
Soins Form Pedagog Encadr. 1998(28):32-5.
3
Individual vs collective activity: a primary nursing paradox.个体活动与集体活动:一个主要护理悖论。
Br J Nurs. 1996;5(12):760-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1996.5.12.760.
4
A call for help: collaborative nursing research.求助呼吁:合作护理研究。
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 1993 Apr-Jun;4(2):48-52.
5
Problems of the researching person: doing insider research with your peer group.研究者面临的问题:与同行群体进行内部研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 1996 Aug;3(4):267. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.1996.tb00121.x.
6
Collaboration as an organizational process.作为组织过程的协作
J Nurs Educ. 1991 Apr;30(4):189-91. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19910401-13.
7
Harnessing collaboration to build nursing research capacity: a research team journey.利用合作提升护理研究能力:一个研究团队的历程
Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Aug;27(6):577-87. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.019. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
8
Programmatic research: a collaborative model.
J Prof Nurs. 1986 Sep-Oct;2(5):309-17. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(86)80031-x.
9
Communication resolves nurse conflicts.沟通能解决护士之间的冲突。
Pa Nurse. 2006 Sep;61(3):5, 33.
10
Pitfalls of partnerships: the differential status of disciplines.合作的陷阱:各学科的不同地位
Can J Nurs Res. 1994 Spring;26(1):9-12.