• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦点小组:收集汇总层面的数据以了解社区健康现象。

Focus groups: collecting aggregate-level data to understand community health phenomena.

作者信息

Stevens P E

机构信息

Health Maintenance Department, School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Mil-waukee 53201, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Nurs. 1996 Jun;13(3):170-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.1996.tb00237.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1525-1446.1996.tb00237.x
PMID:8677232
Abstract

Focus-group method is an apt strategy for studying community health phenomena at the aggregate level. Not only can its use facilitate the inclusion of segments of the population who have been underserved by previous research, but it can generate a depth of understanding about public health problems, community strengths, and potential interventions that have local meaning and utility. Advantages and potential uses of focus groups are explored, as well as purposes and processes of focus-group interviewing, strategies for analysis, methodological limitations, and implications for practice and policy. The author presents investigatory examples to illustrate how focus-group method expands on the possibilities of individual interviewing to explore community interpretations and understand the health needs and experiences of an aggregate.

摘要

焦点小组方法是在总体层面研究社区健康现象的一种恰当策略。它的运用不仅有助于纳入以往研究中未得到充分服务的人群,还能深入理解具有地方意义和实用性的公共卫生问题、社区优势以及潜在干预措施。本文探讨了焦点小组的优势和潜在用途,以及焦点小组访谈的目的和过程、分析策略、方法局限性,以及对实践和政策的影响。作者列举了调查实例,以说明焦点小组方法如何拓展了个体访谈的可能性,从而探究社区的解读,并理解总体人群的健康需求和经历。

相似文献

1
Focus groups: collecting aggregate-level data to understand community health phenomena.焦点小组:收集汇总层面的数据以了解社区健康现象。
Public Health Nurs. 1996 Jun;13(3):170-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.1996.tb00237.x.
2
Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.文献综述:针对文化和语言背景各异群体开展焦点小组研究的注意事项
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1000-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x.
3
Collecting qualitative data: Part II. Group discussion as a method: experience, rationale and limitations [corrected].收集定性数据:第二部分。作为一种方法的小组讨论:经验、基本原理及局限性[修订版]
Contemp Nurse. 2004 Apr-Jun;16(3):240-51. doi: 10.5172/conu.16.3.240.
4
The learning curve: the advantages and disadvantages in the use of focus groups as a method of data collection.学习曲线:使用焦点小组作为数据收集方法的优缺点。
Nurse Res. 2004;11(4):79-88. doi: 10.7748/nr2004.07.11.4.79.c6217.
5
Videotaped focus groups: transforming a therapeutic strategy into a research tool.
Nurs Forum. 2000 Jan-Mar;35(1):15-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2000.tb01173.x.
6
Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group.收集和分析定性数据:焦点小组提出的问题
J Adv Nurs. 1998 Aug;28(2):345-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00692.x.
7
Learn more using focus groups.
AORN J. 2000 Apr;71(4):897-900. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62276-x.
8
Patient satisfaction with chronic pain management.患者对慢性疼痛管理的满意度。
Nurs Stand. 2001;15(51):33-8. doi: 10.7748/ns.15.51.33.s59.
9
Improving patient satisfaction through focus group interviews.通过焦点小组访谈提高患者满意度。
Nurs Leadersh Forum. 1998 Winter;3(4):124-9.
10
Analyzing focus group interviews.分析焦点小组访谈。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2006 Sep-Oct;33(5):478-81. doi: 10.1097/00152192-200609000-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Elderly Care Practitioners' Perceptions of Moral Distress in the Work Development Discussions.老年护理从业者在工作发展讨论中对道德困境的认知
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;11(3):291. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030291.
2
Being Heard, Exerting Influence, or Knowing How to Play the Game? Expectations of Client Involvement among Social and Health Care Professionals and Clients.被倾听、施加影响还是懂得游戏规则?社会和医疗保健专业人员及客户对客户参与的期望。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 5;17(16):5653. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165653.
3
Young People's Response to Six Smartphone Apps for Anxiety and Depression: Focus Group Study.
年轻人对六款治疗焦虑和抑郁的智能手机应用程序的反应:焦点小组研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Oct 2;6(10):e14385. doi: 10.2196/14385.
4
Enabling activity in palliative care: focus groups among occupational therapists.促进姑息治疗中的活动:职业治疗师的焦点小组。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Feb 7;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0394-9.
5
"Once the delivery is done, they have finished": a qualitative study of perspectives on postnatal care referrals by traditional birth attendants in Ebonyi state, Nigeria.“一旦分娩完成,他们的工作就结束了”:尼日利亚埃邦伊州传统助产妇对产后护理转诊的看法的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 19;17(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1616-x.
6
Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Youths' Public Facilities Use and Psychological Well-Being: A Mixed-Method Study.跨性别及性别不一致青少年对公共设施的使用与心理健康:一项混合方法研究。
Transgend Health. 2017 Oct 1;2(1):140-150. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2017.0020. eCollection 2017.
7
Patient and physiotherapist perceptions of rehabilitation following primary lumbar discectomy: a qualitative focus group study embedded within an external pilot and feasibility trial.患者和物理治疗师对初次腰椎间盘切除术后康复的看法:一项纳入外部预试验和可行性试验的定性焦点小组研究
BMJ Open. 2017 May 4;7(4):e015878. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015878.
8
Implementation of the guidelines for targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest: a longitudinal qualitative study of barriers and facilitators perceived by hospital resuscitation champions.心脏骤停后目标温度管理指南的实施:对医院复苏倡导者所感知的障碍和促进因素的纵向定性研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 5;6(1):e009261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009261.
9
Community leaders' perspectives on engaging African Americans in biobanks and other human genetics initiatives.社区领袖对让非裔美国人参与生物样本库及其他人类遗传学倡议的看法。
J Community Genet. 2013 Oct;4(4):483-94. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0155-z. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
10
Asian American midlife women's attitudes toward physical activity.亚裔美国中年女性对体育活动的态度。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012 Sep-Oct;41(5):650-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01392.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12.