Bellissant E, Bénichou J, Chastang C
Centre Hospitalier Regional, Paris, France.
Am J Clin Oncol. 1996 Aug;19(4):422-30. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199608000-00021.
In cancer, phase II clinical trials are usually noncomparative. Their purpose is to determine whether a new chemotherapy is effective enough to warrant further evaluation in phase III. Therefore, in order to meet ethical requirements, decision-making methods must allow for early termination when inefficacy (or efficacy) is clear. We previously extended the Triangular Test, a group sequential method initially proposed for phase III trials, to phase II trials and demonstrated its advantages (i.e., type I error rate alpha and power close to the nominal values, reduction of the sample size) over other methods. The aim of this paper is to present the Triangular Test from a practical standpoint that will facilitate its application to phase II clinical trials in oncology. After summarizing the minimal theoretical knowledge required to use the method appropriately, we discuss its use in the design and analysis of a phase II cancer trial.
在癌症领域,II期临床试验通常是非对照性的。其目的是确定一种新的化疗方法是否足够有效,从而值得在III期进行进一步评估。因此,为了满足伦理要求,决策方法必须在无效(或有效)情况明确时允许提前终止试验。我们之前将最初为III期试验提出的成组序贯方法——三角检验扩展到了II期试验,并证明了其相对于其他方法的优势(即I型错误率α和检验效能接近标称值、样本量减少)。本文的目的是从实际应用的角度介绍三角检验,这将有助于其在肿瘤学II期临床试验中的应用。在总结了正确使用该方法所需的最少理论知识后,我们讨论了其在II期癌症试验设计和分析中的应用。