Aiba K
Dept. of Clinical Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japan.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1996 Apr;23(5):535-48.
Chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer is reviewed stressing the historical development of combination chemotherapy and the application of a new idea called biochemical modulation based upon a preclinical biochemical and molecular pharmacological rationale. While 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a key drug for more than three decades, many a combination chemotherapy with 5-FU and other drugs such as methyl-CCNU, vincristine, streptozocin, mitomycin C and so on has been studied extensively only to show no significant improvement compared with monotherapy with 5-FU. Recently, the mechanisms of 5-FU action have been recognized more in detail biochemically, and it enabled us to try the drug in a more optimal way. For example, bolus i.v. infusion of 5-FU can produce a response rate of around 10% to 15% at most for advanced colorectal cancer. On the other hand, a more continuous mode of i.v. infusion, typically known as protracted i.v. infusion lasting up to 6 weeks or more, can produce the response rate of up to 40%. The difference underlying the mechanisms of action in these typical two administrative methods is that the main target can be RNA-directed cytotoxicity in the bolus type infusion and it can be shifted toward DNA-directed cytotoxicity in the continuous type infusion through the inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS) enzyme activity which is relevant to DNA de novo synthesis. More importantly, investigations using clinical materials imply that DNA-directed cytotoxicity may be more relevant in a clinical setting, showing consistent findings between bench-top experiments and the clinical outcome. Given a precise knowledge about the mechanisms of 5-FU action, we could have developed a new type combination chemotherapy called biochemical modulation which manipulates non-cytotoxic agents or cytotoxic agents in non-cytotoxic level as modulators enhancing cytotoxicity of 5-FU biochemically. Among modulators, leucovorin (LV) has been shown to have a pivotal role in this field. Although no optimal combination dose schedule of LV is well known, randomized studies have shown improved activity of 5-FU modulation by LV over 5-FU alone for advanced colorectal cancer doubled the response rate by monotherapy (20-25%) vs 10-15%). New drugs are also promising with the response rate of 25% approximately obtained with a new camptothecin derivative CPT-11, and a pure TS inhibitor, Tomudex in phase II trials. It is also necessary to explore the clinical activity of the combination of low-dose cisplatin and 5-FU, chronotherapy, new dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitors and new TS inhibitors. We are facing a new era with a new treatment concept of biochemical modulation or an understanding of optimal administrative methods with the key drug, 5-FU. Obviously, we still seek new agents or new laboratory rationales which enable us to extend the survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
本文回顾了晚期结直肠癌的化疗,着重介绍了联合化疗的历史发展以及基于临床前生化和分子药理理论的生化调节这一新理念的应用。尽管5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)三十多年来一直是关键药物,但许多将5-FU与其他药物(如甲基环己亚硝脲、长春新碱、链脲佐菌素、丝裂霉素C等)联合的化疗方案都经过了广泛研究,结果显示与5-FU单药治疗相比并无显著改善。最近,5-FU的作用机制在生化方面得到了更详细的认识,这使我们能够以更优化的方式使用该药物。例如,静脉推注5-FU对晚期结直肠癌的缓解率最高可达10%至15%。另一方面,更持续的静脉输注方式,通常称为持续静脉输注长达6周或更长时间,缓解率可达40%。这两种典型给药方法作用机制的差异在于,推注式输注的主要靶点可能是RNA导向的细胞毒性,而持续输注式通过抑制与DNA从头合成相关的胸苷酸合成酶(TS)酶活性,可使靶点转向DNA导向的细胞毒性。更重要的是,利用临床材料进行的研究表明,DNA导向的细胞毒性在临床环境中可能更具相关性,在实验台实验和临床结果之间显示出一致的发现。鉴于对5-FU作用机制的精确了解,我们能够开发出一种新型联合化疗,即生化调节,它将非细胞毒性药物或处于非细胞毒性水平的细胞毒性药物作为调节剂,从生化角度增强5-FU的细胞毒性。在这些调节剂中,亚叶酸(LV)在该领域已显示出关键作用。尽管尚无众所周知的LV最佳联合剂量方案,但随机研究表明,对于晚期结直肠癌,LV调节5-FU的活性优于5-FU单药治疗,联合治疗的缓解率是单药治疗(20 - 25%对10 - 15%)的两倍。新药也很有前景,一种新的喜树碱衍生物CPT - 11和一种纯TS抑制剂Tomudex在II期试验中获得了约25%的缓解率。探索低剂量顺铂与5-FU联合、时辰疗法、新型二氢嘧啶脱氢酶抑制剂和新型TS抑制剂的临床活性也很有必要。我们正面临一个新时代,有着生化调节这一全新的治疗理念,或者说是对关键药物5-FU最佳给药方法的认识。显然,我们仍在寻找新的药物或新的实验室理论依据,以使晚期结直肠癌患者的生存期得以延长。