Endo M, Kobayashi K, Tsubota M, Seki M, Sato H, Noto T, Iwa T
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Japan.
Surg Today. 1996;26(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00311983.
This study was conducted to compare the midline incision right retroperitoneal approach for repairing abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with the transperitoneal approach. The intra- and postoperative course of 15 patients who underwent AAA repair using the transperitoneal approach between 1987 and 1991 and another 15 patients who underwent AAA repair using the retroperitoneal approach between 1991 and 1994 were evaluated. The incidence of postoperative wound complications was also assessed. There was no operative or hospital death in either group. Although a significantly longer interval was required from the incision to the aortic clamp using the extraperitoneal method, there were no statistical differences in the aortic clamping time, total operation time, or blood loss between the two groups. On the other hand, there was a statistically significant improvement in bowel function and a significant reduction in the length of postoperative hospitalization following the extraperitoneal procedure. Furthermore, no wound complications such as those associated with the left flank incision developed after the extraperitoneal procedure. Thus, we recommend the midline incision right retroperitoneal approach for AAA as it does not involve muscle division and is associated with fewer complications.
本研究旨在比较经腹中线右腹膜后途径与经腹途径修复腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的效果。对1987年至1991年间采用经腹途径进行AAA修复的15例患者以及1991年至1994年间采用腹膜后途径进行AAA修复的另外15例患者的术中及术后病程进行了评估。还评估了术后伤口并发症的发生率。两组均无手术或医院死亡病例。虽然采用腹膜外方法从切口到主动脉钳夹所需的时间明显更长,但两组在主动脉钳夹时间、总手术时间或失血量方面无统计学差异。另一方面,腹膜外手术后肠道功能有统计学意义的改善,术后住院时间显著缩短。此外,腹膜外手术后未出现如左侧腹切口相关的伤口并发症。因此,我们推荐采用腹中线右腹膜后途径治疗AAA,因为它不涉及肌肉分离且并发症较少。