Borowicz K K, Gasior M, Kleinrok Z, Czuczwar S J
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Lublin Medical University School, Poland.
Epilepsia. 1996 Jul;37(7):618-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00625.x.
The objective of this study was to evaluate an interaction of two competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonists, LY 235959 l(-)-3R,4aS,6R,8aR-6-(phosphonomethyl)-decahydroiso-qu inoline-3-carboxylic acid; < or = 0.5 mg/kg] or LY 233053 cis-(+/-)-4-[(2H-tetrazol-5-yl) methyl]piperidine-2-carboxylic acid; < or = 5 mg/kg] with carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital, or valproate magnesium against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions in mice.
Electroconvulsions were produced by means of an alternating current (ear-clip electrodes, 0.2-s stimulus duration, tonic hindlimb extension taken as the end point) delivered by a Hugo-Sachs stimulator (Type 221, reiburg, FRG). Adverse effects were evaluated in the chimney test (motor performance) and passive-avoidance ask (long-term memory). Plasma levels of antiepileptic rugs were measured by immunofluorescence.
Both LY 235959 and LY 233053 ( < or = 0.5 and 5 mg/kg, respectively) did not influence the electroconvulsive threshold but potentiated the anticonvulsant action of all antiepileptics studied. The combined treatment of LY 233053 (5 mg/kg) with carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin, or phenobarbital (providing a 50% protection against maximal electroshock) resulted in the impairment of long-term memory. No adverse effects were observed with combinations of LY 235959 with these antiepileptics. The combined treatment of valproate with either LY 235959 or LY 233053 was superior to valproate alone, as regards motor impairment, but not the impairment of long-term memory. Neither NMDA-receptor antagonist elevated the total plasma levels of antiepileptic drugs studied.
It may be concluded that NMDA-receptor blockade leads to the enhanced anticonvulsive action of conventional antiepileptics against maximal electroshock-induced seizures. A pharmacokinetic interaction does not seem probable.
本研究的目的是评估两种竞争性N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂,LY 235959 [l(-)-3R,4aS,6R,8aR-6-(膦酰甲基)-十氢异喹啉-3-羧酸;≤0.5mg/kg] 或LY 233053 [顺式-(±)-4-[(2H-四唑-5-基)甲基]哌啶-2-羧酸;≤5mg/kg] 与卡马西平、苯妥英、苯巴比妥或丙戊酸镁联合使用对小鼠最大电休克诱导惊厥的作用。
通过Hugo-Sachs刺激器(型号221,德国雷堡)施加交流电(耳夹电极,刺激持续时间0.2秒,以强直性后肢伸展为终点)诱发惊厥。在烟囱试验(运动性能)和被动回避试验(长期记忆)中评估不良反应。通过免疫荧光法测量抗癫痫药物的血浆水平。
LY 235959和LY 233053(分别为≤0.5和5mg/kg)均不影响惊厥阈值,但增强了所有研究的抗癫痫药物的抗惊厥作用。LY 233053(5mg/kg)与卡马西平、苯妥英或苯巴比妥联合治疗(对最大电休克提供50%的保护)导致长期记忆受损。LY 235959与这些抗癫痫药物联合使用未观察到不良反应。就运动功能损害而言,丙戊酸与LY 235959或LY 233053联合治疗优于单独使用丙戊酸,但对长期记忆的损害无差异。两种NMDA受体拮抗剂均未提高所研究抗癫痫药物的血浆总水平。
可以得出结论,NMDA受体阻断导致传统抗癫痫药物对最大电休克诱导癫痫发作的抗惊厥作用增强。药代动力学相互作用似乎不太可能。