Suppr超能文献

在评估药物治疗的抗心绞痛效果时,运动方案重要吗?

Does the exercise protocol matter when assessing the anti-anginal effects of drug therapy?

作者信息

Patel D J, Mulcahy D, Norrie J, Sparrow J, Wright C, Ford I, Fox K M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, U.K.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1995 Dec;16(12):1773-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060827.

Abstract

Four exercise test protocols (Bruce, Balke, Ellestad and Steep) were compared in 16 patients with proven coronary artery disease in demonstrating the anti-anginal effects of sublingual glyceryl trinitrate in a randomization double-blind trial. Glyceryl trinitrate significantly improved the time, heart rate and rate pressure product to peak exercise, onset of angina and 1 mm ST segment depression in all four protocols (P < 0.05) (except rate pressure product to angina in the Balke protocol). The increase in exercise time was greatest for the Balke protocol at peak exercise (188.1 +/- 187.1) (mean +/- SD in s), at onset of angina (251.9 +/- 247.1) and at 1 mm ST depression (233.6 +/- 243.8), followed by the Steep and Bruce protocols, and was lowest for the Ellestad protocol 41.9 +/- 42.4, 96.5 +/- 65.8, 82.6 +/- 74.0, respectively. Increase in time to peak exercise with glyceryl trinitrate was significantly greater for the Balke protocol in comparison with the other three protocols and for the Bruce and Steep protocols when compared to the Ellestad protocol. Time to 1 mm ST depression with treatment was significantly greater on the Balke and Bruce protocols than the Ellestad protocol, and to onset of angina for the Balke compared to other three protocols. There were no significant differences between the Bruce and Steep protocols for any of the endpoints. The magnitude of treatment effect in the different protocols was accompanied by correspondingly greater inter-patient variability such that no protocol was more, or less, sensitive than another in detecting treatment effect. Changes in heart rate and rate pressure product with treatment were generally similar between the different protocols. In conclusion, a protocol with small and frequent increments (Balke), although able to show greater increase in exercise duration with glyceryl trinitrate than more aggressive protocols, is no more sensitive at detecting treatment effect.

摘要

在一项随机双盲试验中,对16例已确诊冠心病的患者比较了四种运动试验方案(布鲁斯、巴尔克、埃尔斯塔德和陡坡),以证明舌下硝酸甘油的抗心绞痛作用。硝酸甘油在所有四种方案中均显著改善了达到运动峰值的时间、心率和心率压力乘积、心绞痛发作时间以及ST段压低1mm的时间(P<0.05)(巴尔克方案中心绞痛发作时的心率压力乘积除外)。在运动峰值时,巴尔克方案运动时间增加最多(188.1±187.1)(单位为秒,均值±标准差),心绞痛发作时为(251.9±247.1),ST段压低1mm时为(233.6±243.8),其次是陡坡和布鲁斯方案,埃尔斯塔德方案增加最少,分别为41.9±42.4、96.5±65.8、82.6±74.0。与其他三种方案相比,巴尔克方案使用硝酸甘油后达到运动峰值的时间增加显著更多,与埃尔斯塔德方案相比,布鲁斯和陡坡方案也是如此。治疗后ST段压低1mm的时间在巴尔克和布鲁斯方案中显著长于埃尔斯塔德方案,巴尔克方案中心绞痛发作时间与其他三种方案相比更长。布鲁斯和陡坡方案在任何终点指标上均无显著差异。不同方案中治疗效果的大小伴随着相应更大的患者间变异性,因此在检测治疗效果方面,没有一种方案比另一种方案更敏感或更不敏感。不同方案中治疗后心率和心率压力乘积的变化通常相似。总之,一种增量小且频繁的方案(巴尔克),尽管与更激进的方案相比,使用硝酸甘油后能显示出运动持续时间有更大增加,但在检测治疗效果方面并不更敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验