Battagel J M, Orton H S
Department of Child Dental Health, London Hospital Medical College Dental School, UK.
Eur J Orthod. 1995 Dec;17(6):467-82. doi: 10.1093/ejo/17.6.467.
This retrospective, cephalometric study examined the effects of treatment in a group of 83 Class III, Skeletal III children, who were considered suitable for orthodontic correction of their malocclusions. All children completed therapy successfully: 44 individuals were treated with headgear to the mandibular dentition and for 39 a customized facemask was prescribed. These two groups were compared with 30 untreated Class III controls. Data were examined at the beginning and end of active treatment for the treated groups, and over a similar time interval for the controls. Where differences between the sexes were apparent, data for each sex are given separately. Where no significant differences were seen, data are pooled. In order to standardize the results, treatment (or observation) effects are presented as average changes per year. Surprisingly, despite the very different methods of applying the extra-oral force, the two treated groups showed strikingly similar therapeutic effects. The reverse overjet was corrected with little alteration in overbite. Upper incisors proclined whilst the lowers retroclined, becoming less prominent in relation to APo. The mandible hinged downwards and backwards, whilst the maxillary complex advanced. Lower face height increased more than would be expected by growth alone. Mirroring the hard tissue changes, the soft tissue profile improved and the relationship between the upper and lower lips became more harmonious. For only three parameters did the facemask children demonstrate a significantly better performance than their headgear peers: the overjet and the antero-posterior position of the lower lip and chin in females. It was concluded that, despite their differing approaches, the customized facemask and headgear to the mandibular dentition have very similar treatment effects. Both are clinically effective. However, treatment can begin earlier, and both the skeletal and profile changes are marginally superior when a facemask is worn.
这项回顾性头影测量研究,调查了83名Ⅲ类骨骼Ⅲ类错牙合畸形儿童的治疗效果,这些儿童被认为适合接受正畸矫治。所有儿童均成功完成治疗:44例采用下颌牙列头帽治疗,39例佩戴定制面罩。将这两组与30例未经治疗的Ⅲ类对照儿童进行比较。在治疗组积极治疗开始和结束时检查数据,对照组在相似的时间间隔内检查数据。若性别差异明显,则分别给出各性别的数据。若未发现显著差异,则合并数据。为使结果标准化,治疗(或观察)效果以每年的平均变化表示。令人惊讶的是,尽管施加口外力的方法截然不同,但两个治疗组的治疗效果却惊人地相似。反覆盖得到矫正,覆牙合几乎没有改变。上切牙前倾,下切牙后倾,相对于APo不那么突出。下颌向下向后铰接,而上颌复合体向前移动。下面高增加幅度超过仅由生长预期的增加幅度。与硬组织变化相对应,软组织侧貌改善,上下唇关系变得更加协调。仅在三个参数方面,佩戴面罩的儿童表现明显优于佩戴头帽的同龄人:女性的覆盖、下唇和下巴的前后位置。研究得出结论,尽管方法不同,但定制面罩和下颌牙列头帽的治疗效果非常相似。两者在临床上均有效。然而,治疗可以更早开始,佩戴面罩时骨骼和侧貌变化略优。