Takahashi K, Nagao K, Narita A, Iwabuchi S, Odagiri S
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Aomori Rhosai Hospital, Hachinohe, Japan.
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1996 Jan;44(1):25-30.
We evaluated 39 cases where sequential anastomoses had been performed using arterial graft (AG) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Fourty three AGs were used, and anastomosed to 87 coronary arterial branches. The details of these anastomoses were: 25 right gastroepiploic arteries (RGEA) to 51 branches; 10 left internal thoracic arteries (LITA) to 20 branches; 8 right internal thoracic arteries (RITA) to 16 branches. The interrupted suture was employed for all anastomoses. The proxymal site was initially anastomosed in the parallel way to a native coronary artery, and then, the distal anastomosis was done. In CABG using RGEA, the number of cases receiving anastomoses to RCA and LCX was the largest as in 13 cases, and the patent rate was favorable. There were also 8 cases of anastomoses to LAD and Dx and these GEA'S grafts were all patent. But, in the 2 cases of astomoses to RCA and LAD, the GEA's grafts between RCA and LAD were occluded. Therefore, this combination was thought to be inadequate for sequential hypass. On the other hand, in the 10 cases using LITA, these grafts were all anastomosed to LCA system, and were all patent. In the 8 cases using RITA, 4 in-situ grafts and 4 free grafts were employed. There were 3 anastomoses to LAD and D1 in the former, and 2 cases each of anastomoses to LAD and D1, and LCx (segment 12) in the latter. The patency was excellent, 100%. Although there were 1 case of post-operative early death (renal failure) and 1 case of remote death (cerebral infarction), they were found not due to arterial sequential bypass. In the 37 cases of post-operative angiography, patency was recognized in 40 AGs out of the 41 (97.6%) and 78 anastomosed branches out of the 83 (94.0%). These satisfactory findings indicate that it is possible and effective to perform sequential bypass in multivessel GABG using AG.
我们评估了39例在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中使用动脉移植物(AG)进行序贯吻合的病例。共使用了43根AG,与87支冠状动脉分支进行了吻合。这些吻合的详细情况如下:25根右胃网膜动脉(RGEA)与51支分支吻合;10根左胸廓内动脉(LITA)与20支分支吻合;8根右胸廓内动脉(RITA)与16支分支吻合。所有吻合均采用间断缝合。近端部位最初以平行方式与自体冠状动脉进行吻合,然后进行远端吻合。在使用RGEA的CABG中,与右冠状动脉(RCA)和左旋支(LCX)进行吻合的病例数最多,为13例,通畅率良好。也有8例与左前降支(LAD)和对角支(Dx)进行吻合,这些GEA移植物均通畅。但是,在2例与RCA和LAD进行吻合的病例中,RCA和LAD之间的GEA移植物闭塞。因此,这种组合被认为不适合序贯搭桥。另一方面,在使用LITA的10例病例中,这些移植物均与左冠状动脉系统进行吻合,且均通畅。在使用RITA的8例病例中,采用了4例原位移植物和4例游离移植物。前者中有3例与LAD和第一对角支(D1)进行吻合,后者中有2例与LAD和D1进行吻合,还有2例与LCx(第12段)进行吻合。通畅率极佳,为100%。虽然有1例术后早期死亡(肾衰竭)和1例远期死亡(脑梗死),但发现并非由于动脉序贯搭桥所致。在37例术后血管造影病例中,41根AG中有40根(97.6%)显示通畅,83支吻合分支中有78支(94.0%)显示通畅。这些令人满意的结果表明,在多支血管CABG中使用AG进行序贯搭桥是可行且有效的。