• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

记忆的加工分离范式存在的一些问题。

Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory.

作者信息

Dodson C S, Johnson M K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Princeton University, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 1996 Jun;125(2):181-94. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.125.2.181.

DOI:10.1037//0096-3445.125.2.181
PMID:8683193
Abstract

The process-dissociation framework (L. L. Jacoby, 1991) is a technique for deriving estimates of controlled (e.g., recollection) and automatic (e.g., familiarity) memory processes. The authors examined 3 assumptions of this framework. In Experiment 1, estimates of familiarity were affected by varying the proportion of old targets to old nontargets on the inclusion and exclusion tests and whether or not the tests were completed with full or divided attention, violating the assumption that familiarity's influence is automatic. In Experiment 2, the similarity of old targets and old nontargets was manipulated to show that source confusions (i.e., misrecollections) violate the assumption that the process of recollection is all-or-none. Source confusions also create an imbalance in the influence of recollection on the inclusion and exclusion tests, violating the consistency assumption. The source-monitoring framework is consistent with the present findings.

摘要

加工分离框架(L. L. 雅各比,1991年)是一种用于推导对控制性(如回忆)和自动性(如熟悉性)记忆过程估计值的技术。作者检验了该框架的3个假设。在实验1中,通过改变包含测试和排除测试中旧目标与旧非目标的比例,以及测试是在全神贯注还是分心状态下完成的,来考察熟悉性估计值受到的影响,这违背了熟悉性影响是自动的这一假设。在实验2中,对旧目标和旧非目标的相似性进行了操控,以表明来源混淆(即错误回忆)违背了回忆过程是全或无的这一假设。来源混淆还会在回忆对包含测试和排除测试的影响上造成不平衡,违背了一致性假设。来源监测框架与当前的研究结果相符。

相似文献

1
Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory.记忆的加工分离范式存在的一些问题。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1996 Jun;125(2):181-94. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.125.2.181.
2
Consequences of violating the assumption of independence in the process dissociation procedure: a word fragment completion study.在过程分离程序中违反独立性假设的后果:一项单词片段完成研究。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Jul;26(4):617-32. doi: 10.3758/bf03211382.
3
Semantic memory recognition is supported by intrinsic recollection-like processes: "The butcher on the bus" revisited.语义记忆识别由内在的类似回忆过程支持:“公共汽车上的屠夫”再探讨。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3573-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.040. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
4
Ordinal process dissociation and the measurement of automatic and controlled processes.顺序加工分离与自动和控制加工的测量
Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):553-60. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.553.
5
Process dissociation of familiarity and recollection in children: response deadline affects recollection but not familiarity.儿童中熟悉性与回忆的加工分离:反应截止时间影响回忆但不影响熟悉性。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Mar;131:120-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
6
Use of the process dissociation procedure to study the contextual effects on face recognition in schizophrenia: familiarity, associative recollection and discriminative recollection.使用过程分离程序研究精神分裂症中情境对人脸识别的影响:熟悉度、联想回忆和辨别回忆。
Psychiatry Res. 2007 Jan 15;149(1-3):105-19. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.03.015. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
7
Conceptual automaticity in recognition memory: levels-of-processing effects on familiarity.识别记忆中的概念自动化:加工水平对熟悉度的影响。
Can J Exp Psychol. 1996 Mar;50(1):123-38. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.50.1.123.
8
The effect of context and metamemory judgements on automatic processes in memory.情境与元记忆判断对记忆自动加工过程的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1997 Dec;97(3):219-34. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(97)00032-2.
9
Process dissociation analyses of memory changes in healthy aging, preclinical, and very mild Alzheimer disease: Evidence for isolated recollection deficits.健康衰老、临床前及极轻度阿尔茨海默病记忆变化的过程分离分析:孤立性回忆缺陷的证据
Neuropsychology. 2017 Oct;31(7):708-723. doi: 10.1037/neu0000352. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
10
Recollection and familiarity for words and faces: a study comparing Remember-Know judgements and the Process Dissociation Procedure.对单词和面孔的回忆与熟悉感:一项比较记住-知道判断和加工分离程序的研究。
Memory. 2017 Jan;25(1):19-34. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1120310. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing event-related potentials of retrospective and prospective metacognitive judgments during episodic and semantic memory.比较情景记忆和语义记忆中回溯和前瞻元认知判断的事件相关电位。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 2;13(1):1949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28595-z.
2
Animacy enhances recollection but not familiarity: Convergent evidence from the remember-know-guess paradigm and the process-dissociation procedure.有生命性增强回忆但不增强熟悉感:来自再认-知道-猜测范式和加工分离程序的会聚证据。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Jan;51(1):143-159. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01339-6. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
3
Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data.
编码和检索时分散注意力的影响:更多数据。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Nov;46(8):1263-1277. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0835-3.
4
Recollection-Based Retrieval Is Influenced by Contextual Variation at Encoding but Not at Retrieval.基于回忆的检索受编码时的情境变化影响,但不受检索时的情境变化影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 2;10(7):e0130403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130403. eCollection 2015.
5
Examining the causes of memory strength variability: recollection, attention failure, or encoding variability?考察记忆强度变异性的原因:是再认、注意力失败还是编码变异性?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1726-41. doi: 10.1037/a0033671. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
6
Evidence of automatic processing in sequence learning using process-dissociation.使用过程分离法进行序列学习时自动加工的证据。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2012;8(2):98-108. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0107-z. Epub 2012 May 21.
7
The process-dissociation approach two decades later: convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions.二十年后的加工分离法:汇聚、边界条件与新方向。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Jul;40(5):663-80. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0205-5.
8
Production benefits both recollection and familiarity.产生既有利于回忆也有利于熟悉度。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Apr;40(3):326-38. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0165-1.
9
Monitoring source in an unconscious plagiarism paradigm.在无意识抄袭范式中监测源。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):265-70. doi: 10.3758/BF03209404.
10
Recollection and familiarity: examining controversial assumptions and new directions.再认与熟悉:检验有争议的假设和新方向。
Hippocampus. 2010 Nov;20(11):1178-94. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20864.