Pediatric urology manpower report 1995. Ellen Shapiro on behalf of the American Association of Pediatric Urologists.

PURPOSE

The quality and efficiency of any health care system depend on an appropriate level of manpower. The manpower issues of tomorrow will be influenced by the number of physicians and specialists trained today. The objectives of this manpower survey of pediatric urologists in the United States were to determine anticipated manpower requirements and provide caveats related to the practice of pediatric urology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A manpower questionnaire was distributed to pediatric urologists at the American Urological Association meeting in Las Vegas, Nevada in April 1995. Of the 234 distributed questionnaires 204 (87%) were completed and entered into a computer program.

RESULTS

Of responding pediatric urologists 70% were younger than 50 years, 81% practiced full-time pediatric urology and 45% were university based. The rates of respondents indicating that their present workload was too busy, appropriate or not busy enough were 10, 70 and 20%, respectively. A total of 71% of respondents indicated that they would discourage a newly trained individual from setting up a practice in their area. Of practicing pediatric urologists 26% intended to retire within the next 10 years. In April 1995, 80 respondents (39%) representing 67 practices were considering adding an associate within the next 10 years. By the end of 1995 only 56 practices will remain that will add an associate within the next 10 years. A total of 82% of respondents believed that there was an excess number of pediatric urology training programs.

CONCLUSIONS

The pediatric urology community presently trains 10 to 15 pediatric fellows per year. Based on the 1995 manpower survey, if this trend continues an excess of 40 to 90 pediatric urologists will be trained in the next 10 years. The conclusion that there is an overabundance of pediatric urologists in training is supported by the general consensus of practicing pediatric urologists. Policies related to the training of pediatric urology fellows and urology residents should depend, not on the manpower needs at individual medical centers, but on the collective needs of our specialty and the patients whom we serve.