Suppr超能文献

研究伦理与医学专业。人体辐射实验咨询委员会报告。

Research ethics and the medical profession. Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.

出版信息

JAMA. 1996 Aug 7;276(5):403-9.

PMID:8683820
Abstract

The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments was convened by President Clinton in January 1994 in response to allegations of unethical practices in radiation experiments involving human subjects that were sponsored by the US government between 1944 and 1974. The committee's Final Report was released in October 1995. In addition to analyzing the history of the ethics of medical research involving human subjects, the committee reviewed current federal policies and procedures for protection of human subjects. In this article, the committee's findings are discussed as they relate to the patient-physician relationship, the issue of trust, and the specific role of the physician-investigator in all types of human experimentation. The committee found evidence of discussion of the conduct of human research at the highest levels of the government and within the medical profession, particularly with regard to risk, during the 1940s and 1950s. However, in both federal policy and professional practice, requirements for consent were more likely to apply to "healthy volunteers" than to patient-subjects (ie, those with disease or illness). Today, consensus exists that duties to obtain informed consent apply to all human subjects, whether healthy or sick, regardless of the risk or potential for medical benefit from participation in the research and regardless of the nature of sponsorship or funding (eg, federal, military, or private). Based on a finding of serious deficiencies in the current system of protections for human subjects, the committee offers a number of recommendations, including changes in institutional review boards; in the interpretation of ethics rules and policies; in oversight, accountability, and sanctions for ethics violations; and in compensation for research injuries. More than public policy changes, however, the committee recommends that the medical profession intensify its commitment to the ethics of research involving human subjects.

摘要

1994年1月,克林顿总统召集了人类辐射实验咨询委员会,以回应有关1944年至1974年间由美国政府资助的涉及人类受试者的辐射实验中存在不道德行为的指控。该委员会的最终报告于1995年10月发布。除了分析涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理史外,该委员会还审查了当前联邦保护人类受试者的政策和程序。在本文中,将讨论该委员会的调查结果,这些结果涉及医患关系、信任问题以及医生 - 研究者在各类人体实验中的具体作用。该委员会发现,在20世纪40年代和50年代,政府最高层和医学界内部曾讨论过人体研究的开展情况,尤其是关于风险的讨论。然而,在联邦政策和专业实践中,同意的要求更有可能适用于“健康志愿者”而非患者受试者(即患有疾病或病症的人)。如今,人们已达成共识,即获取知情同意的职责适用于所有人类受试者,无论其健康与否,无论参与研究的风险或潜在医疗益处如何,也无论赞助或资金的性质(例如联邦、军事或私人)如何。基于对当前人类受试者保护体系严重缺陷的调查结果,该委员会提出了一些建议,包括对机构审查委员会的改革;对伦理规则和政策的解释;对违反伦理行为的监督、问责和制裁;以及对研究伤害的赔偿。然而,除了公共政策的改变,该委员会建议医学界加强其对涉及人类受试者研究伦理的承诺。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验