Bacci G, Ferrari S, Rosito P, Barbieri E, Mercuri M, Brach del Prever A, Iantorno D, Forni C, Campanacci M
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna.
Minerva Pediatr. 1995 Nov;47(11):457-69.
From January 1988 to October 1991, one hundred and twelve patients with non metastatic Ewing's sarcoma of bone were treated with a 6 drugs neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocol (IOR/Ew2) in which, to the four drugs usually used in the treatment of this tumor (vincristine, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide and dactinomycin), Ifosfamide and VP-16 were added. The local treatment consisted of radiation therapy in 52 cases, a surgical treatment was performed in 27 cases and in the remaining 33 cases both the previous treatments were used. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (3-6.5), 62 patients (55.3%) remained continuously free of disease and 50 relapsed: 41 with metastases, 8 with mestastases and local recurrence and 1 with local recurrence alone. These results do not differ from the ones obtained in our Institution in 98 patients treated between 1983 and 1988 with a neoadjuvant protocol (IOR/Ew1) in which only VCR, ADM, CTX and actD were used (3 year CDFS: IOR/Ew2 = 60.7%-IOR/Ew1 = 55.1%). In IOR/Ew2 a higher DFS rate was observed in the patients with tumor located in the axile bones in comparison with that obtained in the previous study (IOR/Ew2 = 48.6%, IOR Ew1 = 25.6%). Despite the fact that these results came from a not-randomized study, the authors conclude that the addition of Ifosfamide and VP-16 to the four drugs standard regimen do not improve the outcome of patients with Ewing's sarcoma of bone, with the possible exception of the patients with tumor located in the axile bones. This data should be confirmed in further and larger studies.
1988年1月至1991年10月,112例非转移性骨尤文肉瘤患者接受了6种药物的新辅助化疗方案(IOR/Ew2),该方案在通常用于治疗此肿瘤的4种药物(长春新碱、阿霉素、环磷酰胺和放线菌素D)基础上,添加了异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷。局部治疗包括52例放射治疗、27例手术治疗,其余33例同时采用了上述两种治疗方法。平均随访4.5年(3 - 6.5年),62例患者(55.3%)持续无病生存,50例复发:41例发生转移,8例发生转移和局部复发,1例仅局部复发。这些结果与我们机构在1983年至1988年期间用仅使用长春新碱、阿霉素、环磷酰胺和放线菌素D的新辅助方案(IOR/Ew1)治疗的98例患者所获得的结果无差异(3年无病生存率:IOR/Ew2 = 60.7% - IOR/Ew1 = 55.1%)。与之前的研究相比,在IOR/Ew2方案中,位于中轴骨的肿瘤患者观察到更高的无病生存率(IOR/Ew2 = 48.6%,IOR Ew1 = 25.6%)。尽管这些结果来自一项非随机研究,但作者得出结论,在四种药物的标准方案中添加异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷并不能改善骨尤文肉瘤患者的预后,位于中轴骨的肿瘤患者可能除外。这一数据应在进一步的大型研究中得到证实。