Metheny W P, Ling F W, Holzman G B, Mitchum M J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University School of Medicine, Women and Infants' Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;88(1):133-6. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00116-0.
To answer six questions applicants commonly ask of programs, using the data base of a directory of residency programs in obstetrics and gynecology.
We analyzed data from a directory of 258 civilian residency programs in the United States compiled from a 1994-1995 survey. We expanded the analysis to compare small and large residency programs on the six questions.
The average-size program of four residents per year received 50 applications for each position, offered interviews to less than a third of its applicants, and interviewed 15 applicants for each position. An interview gives an applicant a 7% chance of matching with a program. Small programs (fewer than four residents per year) interviewed more of their applicants than did large programs. Programs reported that their residents' scores on part I ranged from the 25th to the 90th percentile, and on part II from the 38th to the 92nd percentile. In general, residents in large programs scored better on these tests than did residents in small programs. Most programs (74%) considered electives beneficial in obtaining a residency position and reported a higher percentage of elective takers than programs without this policy. One in four residents in a program either took a senior elective there, graduated from the same institution, or both. Residents from programs offering fellowship training were twice as likely to pursue fellowship training than residents from programs with no fellowships. Large programs were four times more likely to sponsor fellowships than were small programs.
Getting an interview in a residency program is a major accomplishment, whereas becoming known in a program may improve the applicant's odds of matching there. Applicants should review a program's policy on electives and selection record. Those considering fellowships should probably apply to programs that offer them. The directory offers a valuable data source for comparing residency programs in obstetrics and gynecology.
利用妇产科住院医师培训项目目录数据库,回答申请人通常向项目提出的六个问题。
我们分析了1994 - 1995年调查汇编的美国258个民用住院医师培训项目目录中的数据。我们扩大了分析范围,就这六个问题比较小型和大型住院医师培训项目。
平均每年有四名住院医师的项目,每个职位收到50份申请,向不到三分之一的申请人提供面试机会,每个职位面试15名申请人。一次面试使申请人有7%的机会与项目匹配。小型项目(每年少于四名住院医师)面试的申请人比大型项目多。各项目报告称,其住院医师第一部分的分数在第25百分位至第90百分位之间,第二部分的分数在第38百分位至第92百分位之间。总体而言,大型项目的住院医师在这些测试中的得分比小型项目的住院医师高。大多数项目(74%)认为选修课程对获得住院医师职位有益,并且报告称选修课程修习者的比例高于没有此政策的项目。项目中有四分之一的住院医师要么在那里修读了高级选修课程,要么毕业于同一机构,或者两者皆是。提供专科培训的项目的住院医师追求专科培训的可能性是没有专科培训项目的住院医师的两倍。大型项目提供专科培训的可能性是小型项目的四倍。
在住院医师培训项目中获得面试是一项重大成就,而在项目中被知晓可能会提高申请人与之匹配的几率。申请人应查看项目关于选修课程的政策和选拔记录。那些考虑专科培训的人可能应该申请提供专科培训的项目。该目录为比较妇产科住院医师培训项目提供了宝贵的数据源。