• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单刺激呈现的斯特鲁普测试的可靠性。

Reliability of the stroop test with single-stimulus presentation.

作者信息

Siegrist M

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology, University of Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Dec;81(3 Pt 2):1295-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1995.81.3f.1295.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1995.81.3f.1295
PMID:8684929
Abstract

Different versions of the Stroop test are used; however, for most versions of the Stroop test, there are no estimations of reliability. In the present study, stimuli were presented singly on a computer screen. 55 Swiss German subjects were tested. Test-retest reliabilities of 'XXXX' strings and conflicting color words were evaluated. Response latencies and Stroop interference were quite reliable. Single-stimulus presentation made it possible also to estimate internal consistency, which was high for classical Stroop interference in this format.

摘要

使用了不同版本的斯特鲁普测试;然而,对于大多数版本的斯特鲁普测试,没有可靠性估计。在本研究中,刺激单独呈现在电脑屏幕上。对55名瑞士德语受试者进行了测试。评估了“XXXX”字符串和冲突颜色词的重测信度。反应潜伏期和斯特鲁普干扰相当可靠。单刺激呈现也使得估计内部一致性成为可能,这种格式下经典斯特鲁普干扰的内部一致性很高。

相似文献

1
Reliability of the stroop test with single-stimulus presentation.单刺激呈现的斯特鲁普测试的可靠性。
Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Dec;81(3 Pt 2):1295-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1995.81.3f.1295.
2
Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.标准及情绪Stroop任务的重测信度:颜色-文字与图片-文字版本的调查
Assessment. 2005 Sep;12(3):330-7. doi: 10.1177/1073191105276375.
3
Effects of taboo words on color-naming performance on a stroop test.禁忌词对斯特鲁普测验中颜色命名表现的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Dec;81(3 Pt 2):1119-22. doi: 10.2466/pms.1995.81.3f.1119.
4
Coloring single stroop elements: reducing automaticity or slowing color processing?给单个斯特鲁普元素上色:是降低自动性还是减缓颜色处理?
J Gen Psychol. 2001 Jan;128(1):98-112. doi: 10.1080/00221300109598901.
5
Stroop interference and the timing of selective response activation.斯特鲁普干扰与选择性反应激活的时机
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Oct;119(10):2247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.218. Epub 2008 Aug 31.
6
Effect of auditory presentation of words on color naming: the intermodal Stroop effect.单词的听觉呈现对颜色命名的影响:跨通道斯特鲁普效应。
Percept Mot Skills. 1990 Jun;70(3 Pt 2):1155-61. doi: 10.2466/pms.1990.70.3c.1155.
7
Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.注意与促进:在 Stroop 任务表现中汇聚信息与无意阅读的对比。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Mar;36(2):411-22. doi: 10.1037/a0018523.
8
Interference as measured by the Stroop Color-Word Test and the Direction-Word Test with varied comparison stimuli.
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Jun;86(3 Pt 1):1019-24. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.86.3.1019.
9
Color- and picture-word Stroop tests: performance changes in old age.颜色及图片-文字斯特鲁普测验:老年期的表现变化
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 May;17(3):390-415. doi: 10.1080/01688639508405132.
10
Features of Stroop and reverse-Stroop interference: analysis by response modality and evaluation.斯特鲁普和反向斯特鲁普干扰的特征:通过反应方式和评估进行分析。
Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Apr;110(2):654-60. doi: 10.2466/PMS.110.2.654-660.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability of individual differences in distractor suppression driven by statistical learning.统计学习驱动的分心物抑制个体差异的可靠性。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):2437-2451. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02157-7. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
2
The Impact of Moderate and High Intensity Cardiovascular Exertion on Sub-Elite Soccer Referee's Cognitive Performance: A Lab-Based Study.中等和高强度心血管运动对足球准精英裁判认知表现的影响:一项基于实验室的研究。
J Sports Sci Med. 2021 Oct 1;20(4):618-625. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2021.618. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Differences in cognitive performance between informal caregivers and non-caregivers.
非照料者与照料者认知表现的差异。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2021 Mar;28(2):284-307. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2020.1749228. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
4
Impaired psychomotor ability and attention in patients with persistent pain: a cross-sectional comparative study.持续性疼痛患者的精神运动能力和注意力受损:一项横断面比较研究。
J Pain Res. 2016 Oct 17;9:825-835. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S114915. eCollection 2016.
5
Diversity of approaches in assessment of executive functions in stroke: limited evidence?中风患者执行功能评估方法的多样性:证据有限?
eNeurologicalSci. 2015 Mar 1;1(1):12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2015.08.002.
6
Neurobehavioural correlates of body mass index and eating behaviours in adults: a systematic review.成人身体质量指数和饮食行为的神经行为学相关性:系统综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Mar;37(3):279-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.008. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
7
Associations between TCF4 gene polymorphism and cognitive functions in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls.TCF4 基因多态性与精神分裂症患者和健康对照者认知功能的相关性。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Mar;38(4):683-9. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.234. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
8
Comparison of inhibition in two timed reaction tasks: the color and emotion Stroop tasks.两项定时反应任务中的抑制作用比较:颜色和情绪Stroop任务。
J Psychol. 2008 Jul;142(4):373-85. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.142.4.373-385.