Bush G, Fink M, Petrides G, Dowling F, Francis A
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences SUNY Stony Brook, USA.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996 Feb;93(2):137-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb09815.x.
Case material and retrospective studies support the use of both lorazepam and ECT in treating catatonia, but few prospective investigations exist and none employ quantitative monitoring of response. In this study we test their efficacy in an open, prospective protocol, and define a "lorazepam test' with predictive value for treatment. Twenty-eight patients with catatonia were treated systematically with parenteral and/or oral lorazepam for up to 5 days, and with ECT if lorazepam failed. Outcome was monitored quantitatively during the treatment phase with the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS). In 16 of 21 patients (76%) who received a complete trial of lorazepam (11 with initial intravenous challenge), catatonic signs resolved. A positive response to an initial parenteral challenge predicted final lorazepam response, as did length of catatonic symptoms prior to treatment. Neither demographic variables nor severity of catatonia predicted response to lorazepam. Four patients failing lorazepam responded promptly to ECT. It is concluded that lorazepam and ECT are effective treatments for catatonia. The rating scale has predictive value and displays sensitivity to change in clinical status.
病例资料和回顾性研究支持使用劳拉西泮和电休克疗法(ECT)治疗紧张症,但前瞻性研究较少,且均未采用反应的定量监测。在本研究中,我们采用开放、前瞻性方案测试它们的疗效,并定义一种对治疗具有预测价值的“劳拉西泮试验”。28例紧张症患者接受了长达5天的胃肠外和/或口服劳拉西泮系统治疗,若劳拉西泮治疗失败则接受ECT治疗。在治疗阶段,使用布什-弗朗西斯紧张症评定量表(BFCRS)对结果进行定量监测。在接受劳拉西泮完整试验的21例患者中的16例(76%)(11例最初接受静脉注射挑战)中,紧张症体征消失。对最初胃肠外挑战的阳性反应可预测最终劳拉西泮反应,治疗前紧张症症状的持续时间也可预测。人口统计学变量和紧张症严重程度均不能预测对劳拉西泮的反应。4例劳拉西泮治疗失败的患者对ECT迅速产生反应。得出的结论是,劳拉西泮和ECT是治疗紧张症的有效方法。该评定量表具有预测价值,并显示出对临床状态变化的敏感性。