Lee E J, Chio C C, Lin H J, Yang L H, Chen H H
Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Medical Centre, Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;138(1):60-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01411726.
From May 1992 to February 1993, 22 cases of hypertensive putaminal haemorrhage (HPH) treated at our hospital were serially measured with transcranial Doppler (TCD) sonography. Among them, 13 patients underwent surgical intervention (3 stereotaxic surgery and 10 craniotomies), and 9 were conservatively treated. Most of the patients of the two operative groups had larger haematomas and developed clinical and/or neurological deterioration, which was the indication for subsequent surgery. Therefore the groups represent different clinical and physiological entities. On admission, the peak MCA velocities (Vs) in the surgical group (stereotaxic and craniotomy) were significantly lower than those in the conservative group (mean +/- S.E.M.: 38.33 +/- 4.26 and 42.00 +/- 2.62 cm/sec vs. 57.22 +/- 3.23 cm/sec; p < 0.005, respectively). The surgical group also had significantly lower diastolic (Vd) and mean (Vm) velocities than those of the conservative group (p < 0.001). Rather, the admission pulsatility indices (PI = (Vs-Vd)/Vm) in the surgical group were significantly higher than those of the conservative group (mean +/- S.E.M.: 1.42 +/- 0.04 and 1.31 +/- 0.09 vs. 0.95 +/- 0.01; p < 0.005, respectively). Time course velocity curves reached a peak around the 3rd hospital day in all the 3 groups. The Glasgow coma scale (GCS) scores positively correlated with the mean MCA velocities (n = 22; r = 0.63, p < 0.005; y = 2.04 x + 8.74), but negatively with PI values on admission (n = 22; r = -0.53, p < 0.05; y = 1.68-0.053 x). On the 7th hospital day, 2 patients with peak MCA velocities below 50 cm/sec had an unfavourable outcome. All the 3 patients in the stereotaxic group had higher peripheral resistance, as compared with those in conservative craniotomy groups (mean +/- S.E.M.: 1.28 +/- 0.13 vs. 0.99 +/- 0.07 and 0.87 +/- 0.06; p < 0.05, respectively). Our study supports TCD as a safe and valid monitoring method in patients with HPH. "Compromised cerebral haemodynamic status" (Vs < 50 cm/sec, Vd < 15 cm/sec, Vm < 25 cm/sec, PI > 1.15) may offer an aid in the decision for surgical intervention in HPH. Postoperatively, patients who made a favourable recovery had a significant increment in the MCA velocities in contrast to those severely disabled, whose MCA velocities remained low.
1992年5月至1993年2月,我院对22例高血压性壳核出血(HPH)患者进行了经颅多普勒(TCD)超声系列检测。其中,13例患者接受了手术干预(3例立体定向手术和10例开颅手术),9例接受保守治疗。两个手术组的大多数患者血肿较大,并出现临床和/或神经功能恶化,这是后续手术的指征。因此,这两组代表了不同的临床和生理实体。入院时,手术组(立体定向手术和开颅手术)的大脑中动脉峰值流速(Vs)显著低于保守治疗组(均值±标准误:38.33±4.26和42.00±2.62厘米/秒,而保守治疗组为57.22±3.23厘米/秒;p分别<0.005)。手术组的舒张期(Vd)和平均(Vm)流速也显著低于保守治疗组(p<0.001)。相反,手术组入院时的搏动指数(PI =(Vs-Vd)/Vm)显著高于保守治疗组(均值±标准误:1.42±0.04和1.31±0.09,而保守治疗组为0.95±0.01;p分别<0.005)。所有3组的时间进程流速曲线在住院第3天左右达到峰值。格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分与大脑中动脉平均流速呈正相关(n = 22;r = 0.63,p<0.005;y = 2.04x + 8.74),但与入院时的PI值呈负相关(n = 2;r = -0.53,p<0.05;y = 1.68-0.053x)。在住院第7天,大脑中动脉峰值流速低于50厘米/秒的2例患者预后不良。与保守开颅手术组相比,立体定向组的所有3例患者外周阻力更高(均值±标准误:1.28±0.13,而保守开颅手术组分别为0.99±0.07和0.87±0.06;p<0.05)。我们的研究支持TCD作为HPH患者一种安全有效的监测方法。“脑血流动力学状态受损”(Vs<50厘米/秒,Vd<15厘米/秒,Vm<2厘米/秒,PI>1.15)可能有助于HPH手术干预决策。术后,恢复良好的患者大脑中动脉流速显著增加,而严重残疾患者的大脑中动脉流速仍然较低。