Suppr超能文献

拉米夫定联合齐多夫定与扎西他滨联合齐多夫定治疗HIV感染患者的比较。一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。北美HIV工作组。

Lamivudine plus zidovudine compared with zalcitabine plus zidovudine in patients with HIV infection. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. North American HIV Working Party.

作者信息

Bartlett J A, Benoit S L, Johnson V A, Quinn J B, Sepulveda G E, Ehmann W C, Tsoukas C, Fallon M A, Self P L, Rubin M

机构信息

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1996 Aug 1;125(3):161-72. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-3-199608010-00001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and activity of lamivudine plus zidovudine with the safety and activity of zalcitabine plus zidovudine in patients with moderately advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who had received zidovudine.

DESIGN

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, three-arm, 24-week study with a blinded extension through at least 52 weeks.

SETTING

21 sites in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico.

PATIENTS

254 patients who had received zidovudine (median duration of previous therapy, 20 months) and had absolute CD4+ cell counts of 100 to 300 cells/mm3.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three regimens: 150 mg of lamivudine twice daily plus 200 mg of zidovudine three times daily (low-dose lamivudine group); 300 mg of lamivudine twice daily plus 200 mg of zidovudine three times daily (high-dose lamivudine group); or 0.75 mg of zalcitabine plus 200 mg of zidovudine three times daily (zalcitabine group).

MEASUREMENTS

Immunologic activity was assessed primarily by changes in absolute CD4+ cell counts; virologic activity was assessed by changes in plasma HIV RNA levels as measured by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Safety of the treatment regimens was assessed through the reporting of adverse events.

RESULTS

78% of patients completed 24 weeks of study treatment, and 63% of patients completed 52 weeks of study treatment. Changes in absolute CD4+ cell counts were significantly better for the low-dose and the high-dose lamivudine groups than for the zalcitabine group (median changes at 52 weeks were +42.5 cells/mm3 in the low-dose lamivudine group, +23.33 cells/mm3 in the high-dose lamivudine group, and -29.58 cells/mm3 in the zalcitabine group). Suppression of plasma HIV RNA levels was similar for all groups (median changes at 52 weeks were -0.48 log10 copies/mL in the low-dose lamivudine group, -0.51 log10 copies/mL in the high-dose lamivudine group, and -0.39 log10 copies/mL in the zalcitabine group). No significant differences in safety were seen among the three regimens, although the low-dose lamivudine regimen appeared to be better tolerated than the others.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HIV infection who had previously received zidovudine, 150 mg of lamivudine plus zidovudine resulted in greater immunologic evidence of benefit than did 0.75 mg of zalcitabine plus zidovudine and was better tolerated than 300 mg of lamivudine plus zidovudine.

摘要

目的

比较拉米夫定加齐多夫定与扎西他滨加齐多夫定在已接受齐多夫定治疗的中度晚期人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染患者中的安全性和活性。

设计

一项多中心、随机、双盲、三臂、为期24周的研究,并进行至少52周的盲法延长期研究。

地点

美国、加拿大和波多黎各的21个研究点。

患者

254例已接受齐多夫定治疗(既往治疗的中位持续时间为20个月)且绝对CD4 +细胞计数为100至300个细胞/mm³的患者。

干预措施

患者被随机分配接受三种治疗方案之一:每日两次150mg拉米夫定加每日三次200mg齐多夫定(低剂量拉米夫定组);每日两次300mg拉米夫定加每日三次200mg齐多夫定(高剂量拉米夫定组);或每日三次0.75mg扎西他滨加200mg齐多夫定(扎西他滨组)。

测量指标

免疫活性主要通过绝对CD4 +细胞计数的变化进行评估;病毒活性通过逆转录酶聚合酶链反应测量的血浆HIV RNA水平的变化进行评估。通过不良事件报告评估治疗方案的安全性。

结果

78%的患者完成了24周的研究治疗,63%的患者完成了52周的研究治疗。低剂量和高剂量拉米夫定组的绝对CD4 +细胞计数变化明显优于扎西他滨组(52周时的中位变化在低剂量拉米夫定组为+42.5个细胞/mm³,高剂量拉米夫定组为+23.33个细胞/mm³,扎西他滨组为-29.58个细胞/mm³)。所有组血浆HIV RNA水平的抑制情况相似(52周时的中位变化在低剂量拉米夫定组为-0.48 log10拷贝/mL,高剂量拉米夫定组为-0.51 log10拷贝/mL,扎西他滨组为-0.39 log10拷贝/mL)。三种治疗方案在安全性方面未见显著差异,尽管低剂量拉米夫定方案似乎比其他方案耐受性更好。

结论

在既往接受过齐多夫定治疗的HIV感染患者中,150mg拉米夫定加齐多夫定比0.75mg扎西他滨加齐多夫定产生了更大的免疫获益证据,且比300mg拉米夫定加齐多夫定耐受性更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验