Nasser F E
Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washingtn, DC, USA.
Gen Dent. 1996 Mar-Apr;44(2):154-8.
Throughout the health care reform debates of 1993 and 1994, the dental profession steadfastly maintained that dentistry was distinct from medicine and that the proposed solutions to the problems in medicine should not be applied to dentistry. The American Dental Association (ADA) supports the position that dental care delivery and financing systems successfully promote access, quality, and cost-containment. Important distinctions exist between the delivery and financing systems of dentistry and medicine. Dentistry is a cottage industry of solo practitioners financed overwhelmingly by private funds. The driving forces behind the growth of managed dental care are the business conditions in dentistry and employers' cost-containment concerns. Dentists should be informed about managed care, which is certain to grow and become an important part of the dental delivery and financing systems but is unlikely to achieve the dominance that it has in medicine.
在1993年和1994年整个医疗保健改革辩论期间,牙科行业坚定地认为,牙科与医学不同,并且针对医学问题提出的解决方案不应应用于牙科。美国牙科协会(ADA)支持这样的立场,即牙科护理提供和融资系统成功地促进了可及性、质量和成本控制。牙科和医学的提供与融资系统之间存在重要区别。牙科是一个以个体从业者为主的家庭手工业,资金绝大多数来自私人资金。管理式牙科护理增长背后的驱动力是牙科行业的商业状况以及雇主对成本控制的担忧。牙医应该了解管理式护理,它肯定会不断发展并成为牙科护理提供和融资系统的重要组成部分,但不太可能像在医学领域那样占据主导地位。