• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗伤害的无过错赔偿:一个案例研究。

No-fault compensation for medical injury: a case study.

作者信息

Horwitz J, Brennan T A

机构信息

Program in Law and Public Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 1995 Winter;14(4):164-79. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.14.4.164.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.14.4.164
PMID:8690342
Abstract

Changes in malpractice law remain an important goal of health care reform. Many state and federal legislators continue to call for measures that would limit the ability of injured patients to sue. There is also growing interest in alternatives to fault-based litigation. As legislators consider no-fault proposals, they can look to Florida's experience with the Neurological Injury Compensation Association (NICA), which for the past four years has been providing no-fault compensation for injured newborns. NICA provides some insights into the ways in which claims are generated, the nature of risk spreading, and the financial viability of a no-fault model.

摘要

医疗事故法的变革仍是医疗改革的一个重要目标。许多州和联邦立法者继续呼吁采取措施限制受伤患者的起诉能力。对于基于过错的诉讼的替代方案也越来越受到关注。在立法者考虑无过错提案时,他们可以参考佛罗里达州神经损伤赔偿协会(NICA)的经验,在过去四年里该协会一直在为受伤的新生儿提供无过错赔偿。NICA为索赔产生的方式、风险分担的性质以及无过错模式的财务可行性提供了一些见解。

相似文献

1
No-fault compensation for medical injury: a case study.医疗伤害的无过错赔偿:一个案例研究。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1995 Winter;14(4):164-79. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.14.4.164.
2
The jury is still in: Florida's Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan after a decade.十年后的裁决仍未定论:佛罗里达州与出生相关的神经损伤赔偿计划。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000 Jun;25(3):499-526. doi: 10.1215/03616878-25-3-499.
3
Compensation for birth-related injury: no-fault programs compared with tort system.与侵权责任制度相比,出生损伤赔偿:无过错赔偿方案
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Jan;153(1):41-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.1.41.
4
No-fault medical liability in Virginia and Florida. A preliminary evaluation.
Eval Health Prof. 1995 Jun;18(2):137-51. doi: 10.1177/016327879501800203.
5
Characteristics of successful claims for payment by the Florida Neurologic Injury Compensation Association Fund.佛罗里达神经损伤赔偿协会基金成功索赔付款的特征。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Aug;177(2):268-71; discussion 271-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70186-8.
6
No-fault system of compensation for obstetric injury: winners and losers.产科损伤无过错赔偿制度:赢家与输家
Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Mar;91(3):437-43. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00705-9.
7
Can no-fault compensation of impaired infants alleviate the malpractice crisis in obstetrics?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1989 Winter;14(4):691-705. doi: 10.1215/03616878-14-4-691.
8
Compensation for medical injury in New Zealand: does "'no-fault" increase the level of claims making and reduce social and clinical selectivity?新西兰的医疗伤害赔偿:“无过错”制度是否会增加索赔水平并减少社会和临床选择?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002 Oct;27(5):833-54. doi: 10.1215/03616878-27-5-833.
9
No-fault malpractice insurance: Swedish plan shows us the way.无过失医疗事故保险:瑞典的方案为我们指明了方向。
Hospitals. 1978 Dec 16;52(24):115-6, 118, 120.
10
Administrative compensation for medical injuries: lessons from three foreign systems.医疗损害的行政赔偿:来自三个外国制度的经验教训。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2011 Jul;14:1-18.

引用本文的文献

1
Canada's System of Liability Coverage in the Event of Medical Harm: Is It Time for No-Fault Reform?加拿大医疗伤害责任保险制度:是否到了无过错改革的时候?
Healthc Policy. 2021 Aug;17(1):30-41. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2021.26580.
2
Artificial Intelligence and Liability in Medicine: Balancing Safety and Innovation.人工智能与医学责任:平衡安全与创新。
Milbank Q. 2021 Sep;99(3):629-647. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12504. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
3
Evaluating the medical malpractice system and options for reform.评估医疗事故制度和改革方案。
J Econ Perspect. 2011 Spring;25(2):93-110. doi: 10.1257/jep.25.2.93.