Suppr超能文献

放射治疗联合或不联合热疗治疗浅表局限性乳腺癌:五项随机对照试验的结果。国际热疗协作组

Radiotherapy with or without hyperthermia in the treatment of superficial localized breast cancer: results from five randomized controlled trials. International Collaborative Hyperthermia Group.

作者信息

Vernon C C, Hand J W, Field S B, Machin D, Whaley J B, van der Zee J, van Putten W L, van Rhoon G C, van Dijk J D, González González D, Liu F F, Goodman P, Sherar M

机构信息

MRC Cyclotron Unit, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Jul 1;35(4):731-44. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(96)00154-x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Claims for the value of hyperthermia as an adjunct to radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer have mostly been based on small Phase I or II trials. To test the benefit of this form of treatment, randomized Phase III trials were needed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five randomized trials addressing this question were started between 1988 and 1991. In these trials, patients were eligible if they had advanced primary or recurrent breast cancer, and local radiotherapy was indicated in preference to surgery. In addition, heating of the lesions and treatment with a prescribed (re)irradiation schedule had to be feasible and informed consent was obtained. The primary endpoint of all trials was local complete response. Slow recruitment led to a decision to collaborate and combine the trial results in one analysis, and report them simultaneously in one publication. Interim analyses were carried out and the trials were closed to recruitment when a previously agreed statistically significant difference in complete response rate was observed in the two larger trials.

RESULTS

We report on pretreatment characteristics, the treatments received, the local response observed, duration of response, time to local failure, distant progression and survival, and treatment toxicity of the 306 patients randomized. The overall CR rate for RT alone was 41% and for the combined treatment arm was 59%, giving, after stratification by trial, an odds ratio of 2.3. Not all trials demonstrated an advantage for the combined treatment, although the 95% confidence intervals of the different trials all contain the pooled odds ratio. The greatest effect was observed in patients with recurrent lesions in previously irradiated areas, where further irradiation was limited to low doses.

CONCLUSION

The combined result of the five trials has demonstrated the efficacy of hyperthermia as an adjunct to radiotherapy for treatment of recurrent breast cancer. The implication of these encouraging results is that hyperthermia appears to have an important role in the clinical management of this disease, and there should be no doubt that further studies of the use of hyperthermia are warranted.

摘要

目的

关于热疗作为癌症放射治疗辅助手段的价值主张大多基于小型I期或II期试验。为了检验这种治疗方式的益处,需要进行随机III期试验。

方法与材料

1988年至1991年间启动了五项针对该问题的随机试验。在这些试验中,如果患者患有晚期原发性或复发性乳腺癌,且局部放射治疗优于手术,则符合入选条件。此外,病灶加热和按规定的(再)照射方案进行治疗必须可行,并获得知情同意。所有试验的主要终点是局部完全缓解。入组缓慢导致决定合作并将试验结果合并进行一次分析,并在一篇出版物中同时报告。进行了中期分析,当在两项较大的试验中观察到完全缓解率存在先前商定的统计学显著差异时,试验停止入组。

结果

我们报告了306例随机分组患者的预处理特征、接受的治疗、观察到的局部反应、反应持续时间、局部复发时间、远处进展和生存情况以及治疗毒性。单纯放疗的总体完全缓解率为41%,联合治疗组为59%,经试验分层后,优势比为2.3。并非所有试验都显示联合治疗具有优势,尽管不同试验的95%置信区间均包含合并后的优势比。在先前接受过照射区域出现复发病灶的患者中观察到最大效果,在这些患者中进一步照射仅限于低剂量。

结论

五项试验的综合结果证明了热疗作为放射治疗辅助手段治疗复发性乳腺癌的疗效。这些令人鼓舞的结果表明,热疗似乎在该疾病临床管理中具有重要作用,毫无疑问,热疗的进一步研究是有必要的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验