Parczyk K, Schneider M R
Research Laboratories of Schering AG, Experimental Oncology, Berlin, Germany.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1996;122(7):383-96. doi: 10.1007/BF01212877.
Endocrine therapy of mammary and prostate cancer has been established for decades. The therapies available to block sex-hormone-receptor-mediated tumor growth are based on two principles: (i) ligand depletion, which can be achieved surgically, by use of luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone analogues or inhibitors of enzymes involved in steroid biosynthesis or by interfering with the feedback mechanisms of sex hormone synthesis at the pituitary/hypothalamic level; (ii) blockade of sex hormone receptor function by use of antihormones. The antiestrogen tamoxifen, which is the compound of choice for the treatment of mammary carcinoma, has the drawback of being a partial agonist. A complete blockade of estrogen receptor (ER) function can be achieved by a new class of compounds, pure antiestrogens. In contrast to aromatase inhibitors, pure antiestrogens are able to block ER activation by ligands other than estradiol and can also interfere with ligand-independent ER activation. In addition to estradiol, progesterone has a strong proliferative effect in mammary carcinomas. Antiprogestins are promising new tools for clinical breast cancer therapy. These compounds clearly need a functionally expressed progesterone receptor to block tumor growth, but there is strong experimental evidence that their tumor inhibition is based on more than just progesterone antagonism. The ability of these compounds to induce tumor cell differentiation that leads to apoptosis is unique among all other endocrine therapeutics. In prostate tumors that have relapsed from current androgen-ablation therapies the androgen receptor (AR) is still expressed and, compared to the primary tumors, its level is often even enhanced. Mutated AR that can be activated by other compounds such as adrenal steroids, estrogens, progestins and even antiandrogens have been detected in recurrent tumors. Thus, relapse of tumors under the selective pressure of common androgen-ablation therapies can be caused by acquired androgen hypersensitivity and AR activation by ligands other than (dihydro-)testosterone. There is a clinical need for future compounds that produce a complete blockade of AR activity even in recurrent tumors. Preclinical experiments indicate that combination therapy as well as the extension of endocrine treatments to several other tumor entities are promising approaches for further developments. Examples are the combination of antiestrogens and antiprogestins for breast cancer treatment, or the treatment of prostate carcinomas with antiprogestins.
乳腺癌和前列腺癌的内分泌治疗已经确立了数十年。现有的阻断性激素受体介导的肿瘤生长的治疗方法基于两个原则:(i)配体耗竭,这可以通过手术、使用促黄体激素释放激素类似物或类固醇生物合成中涉及的酶的抑制剂,或通过干扰垂体/下丘脑水平的性激素合成的反馈机制来实现;(ii)使用抗激素阻断性激素受体功能。抗雌激素他莫昔芬是治疗乳腺癌的首选化合物,但其缺点是它是一种部分激动剂。一类新型化合物,即纯抗雌激素,可以实现雌激素受体(ER)功能的完全阻断。与芳香酶抑制剂不同,纯抗雌激素能够阻断除雌二醇以外的配体对ER的激活,并且还能干扰非配体依赖性的ER激活。除了雌二醇外,孕酮在乳腺癌中具有很强的增殖作用。抗孕激素是临床乳腺癌治疗中有前景的新工具。这些化合物显然需要功能性表达的孕酮受体来阻断肿瘤生长,但有强有力的实验证据表明,它们对肿瘤的抑制作用不仅仅基于孕酮拮抗作用。这些化合物诱导肿瘤细胞分化并导致凋亡的能力在所有其他内分泌治疗药物中是独一无二的。在目前的雄激素剥夺疗法后复发的前列腺肿瘤中,雄激素受体(AR)仍然表达,并且与原发性肿瘤相比,其水平通常甚至会升高。在复发性肿瘤中已检测到可被其他化合物如肾上腺类固醇、雌激素、孕激素甚至抗雄激素激活的突变AR。因此,在常见的雄激素剥夺疗法的选择压力下肿瘤复发可能是由于获得性雄激素超敏反应以及(二氢)睾酮以外的配体对AR的激活所致。临床上需要未来的化合物即使在复发性肿瘤中也能完全阻断AR活性。临床前实验表明,联合治疗以及将内分泌治疗扩展到其他几种肿瘤实体是进一步发展的有前景的方法。例如,抗雌激素和抗孕激素联合用于乳腺癌治疗,或用抗孕激素治疗前列腺癌。