Park C L, Frank A L, Sullivan M, Jindal P, Baxter B D
Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago 60612, USA.
Pediatrics. 1996 Aug;98(2 Pt 1):196-200.
The influenza vaccination rate is very low among children with moderate to severe asthma. This may be partly because of poor patient motivation and failure to visit clinics for vaccination. Another important factor may be health care providers' deferral of vaccination because of concern about the efficacy and safety of influenza vaccination during asthma exacerbations and concurrent prednisone therapy. We therefore examined the safety and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination during acute asthma exacerbation with concomitant prednisone therapy.
A pediatric allergy and pulmonology clinic and a pediatric emergency department.
Children (n = 109) with a known diagnosis of asthma 6 months to 18 years of age were recruited. All participating patients, 59 without asthma symptoms (no prednisone, control group) and 50 with acute asthma exacerbation requiring prednisone burst therapy (prednisone group) received trivalent subvirion influenza vaccine. Fifteen children in the control group and 12 in the prednisone group received a booster dose according to American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines. Serum antibody titers to influenza A/Beijing/32/92 (H3N2), influenza A/Texas/36/91 (H1N1), and influenza B/Panama/45/90 were measured before and 2 weeks after vaccination. Adverse effects noted within 48 hours after vaccine dose were ascertained during the follow-up visit.
The antibody response was analyzed by comparing mean postvaccine titers, the percentage of patients achieving protective antibody levels (> or = 5log2), and the percentage of patients achieving rises in titers of 2log2 or greater. Antibody responses to influenza A/Beijing/32/92 (H3N2) and influenza A/Texas/36/91 (H1N1) in the prednisone-treated and control groups were not different. A significantly better response to the influenza B/Panama/45/90 antigen was seen in the prednisone group for all three parameters. Children who received a booster dose and the subgroup of children with low prevaccination titers (< or = 3log2) showed similar patterns. Adverse effects, including asthma exacerbation, local swelling at the injection site, fever, rash, and headache, were not different in the two groups.
Influenza vaccination can be given safely and effectively to asthmatic children regardless of asthma symptoms or concurrent prednisone therapy when necessary. Vaccination of all moderate to severe asthmatic patients visiting clinics or emergency departments would improve the overall vaccination rate significantly.
中重度哮喘患儿的流感疫苗接种率非常低。这可能部分是因为患者积极性差以及未能前往诊所接种疫苗。另一个重要因素可能是医疗保健提供者因担心在哮喘发作和同时进行泼尼松治疗期间流感疫苗接种的疗效和安全性而推迟接种。因此,我们研究了在急性哮喘发作并同时进行泼尼松治疗期间流感疫苗接种的安全性和免疫原性。
一家儿科过敏与肺病诊所和一家儿科急诊科。
招募了109名年龄在6个月至18岁之间、已知诊断为哮喘的儿童。所有参与的患者,59名无哮喘症状(未使用泼尼松,对照组)和50名有急性哮喘发作需要泼尼松冲击治疗(泼尼松组)均接种了三价亚病毒颗粒流感疫苗。对照组的15名儿童和泼尼松组的12名儿童根据美国儿科学会指南接受了加强剂量接种。在接种前和接种后2周测量针对甲型流感/北京/32/92(H3N2)、甲型流感/德克萨斯/36/91(H1N1)和乙型流感/巴拿马/45/90的血清抗体滴度。在随访期间确定接种疫苗剂量后48小时内出现的不良反应。
通过比较接种后平均滴度、达到保护性抗体水平(≥5log2)的患者百分比以及滴度升高2log2或更高的患者百分比来分析抗体反应。泼尼松治疗组和对照组对甲型流感/北京/32/92(H3N2)和甲型流感/德克萨斯/36/91(H1N1)的抗体反应没有差异。对于所有三个参数,泼尼松组对乙型流感/巴拿马/45/90抗原的反应明显更好。接受加强剂量的儿童以及接种前滴度较低(≤3log2)的儿童亚组表现出相似的模式。两组的不良反应,包括哮喘发作、注射部位局部肿胀、发热、皮疹和头痛,没有差异。
无论哮喘症状如何或必要时是否同时进行泼尼松治疗,流感疫苗都可以安全有效地接种给哮喘患儿。对所有前往诊所或急诊科的中重度哮喘患者进行疫苗接种将显著提高总体接种率。