Sadeghi A, Kuisk H, Tran L, St Royal L
Radiation Therapy Service, Veterans Affairs West Los Angeles Medical Center, California 90073, USA.
Radiother Oncol. 1996 Mar;38(3):215-22. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(96)01704-5.
We analyzed our urethrography procedure regarding the validity of using the ischial tuberosity line (ITL) as the caudal margin of treatment portals for prostate carcinoma. The distances of the external urethral sphincter and the lowest margin of the opacified urinary bladder were analyzed in one hundred fifteen consecutive urethrograms. None showed the urethral sphincter to be caudal to the ITL. Ten percent of the sphincters were located less than 1.0 cm cephalad to the ITL, yielding inadequate treatment coverage if the ITL was relied on. Arbitrarily considering 2.0 cm or more of the urethral irradiation to be excessive, the use of the ITL would then have resulted in unnecessary normal tissue irradiation of 42.5%. The ITL should not be used as the caudal margin for prostate treatment portals. Variation in sphincter position, as also seen on lateral projections, reveal a need for urethrography as a necessary supplement to computed tomography to plan radiation portals for prostate cancer.
我们分析了在前列腺癌治疗射野的尾侧边界使用坐骨结节线(ITL)的有效性方面的尿道造影程序。在连续的115例尿道造影中分析了尿道外括约肌和造影剂充盈膀胱最低边缘的距离。无一例显示尿道括约肌位于ITL的尾侧。10%的括约肌位于ITL头侧不到1.0 cm处,如果依赖ITL,则治疗覆盖不足。任意将2.0 cm或更多的尿道照射视为过度,那么使用ITL将导致42.5%的正常组织受到不必要的照射。ITL不应作为前列腺治疗射野的尾侧边界。如在侧位投照中所见,括约肌位置的变化表明需要进行尿道造影,作为计算机断层扫描的必要补充,以规划前列腺癌的放疗射野。