Suppr超能文献

芬马克全科医生医院研究。患者特征、患者流量及替代护理水平。

The Finnmark general practitioner hospital study. Patient characteristics, patient flow and alternative care level.

作者信息

Aaraas I

机构信息

Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 1995 Dec;13(4):250-6. doi: 10.3109/02813439508996771.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In a study assessing the role of general practitioner hospitals (GPHs) in the health service two main questions were addressed: 1) Are general practitioner beds used for short-term medical observations, or as a supplement for long-term geriatric care? 2) What are the alternatives to stays in GPHs?

DESIGN

In a prospective design GPH stays during 8 weeks were recorded.

SETTING

15 GPH units in Finnmark county in Norway.

SUBJECTS

395 completed stays were recorded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The patients' sex, age and diagnosis, flow of patients, length of stays, bed occupancy rate, and doctors' assessments of alternative level of care.

RESULTS

60% of the patients were admitted from and discharged to their home after a mean stay of 6.8 days. The 19% who were transferred to higher level hospitals stayed significantly shorter than the rest (3.6 days), while 9% transferred from hospital stayed significantly longer (22.3 days). Of the 395 patients discharged 61% were assessed as candidates for higher level hospitals, if GPHs did not exist. 45% of the GPH stays seem to replace higher level hospital admissions.

CONCLUSION

The GPHs have a pre-hospital "buffer" function by preventing patients with acute symptoms from being unnecessarily admitted to general hospitals through short-term observation stays. A post-hospital function was also demonstrated, since GPHs allow for long-term follow up stays for patients transferred from general hospitals.

摘要

目的

在一项评估全科医生医院(GPHs)在医疗服务中作用的研究中,探讨了两个主要问题:1)全科医生病床是用于短期医疗观察,还是作为长期老年护理的补充?2)GPHs住院的替代方案有哪些?

设计

采用前瞻性设计记录8周内的GPHs住院情况。

地点

挪威芬马克郡的15个GPHs单位。

研究对象

记录了395例完整的住院病例。

主要观察指标

患者的性别、年龄和诊断、患者流量、住院时间、床位占用率以及医生对替代护理水平的评估。

结果

60%的患者入院和出院均在家中,平均住院6.8天。转至上级医院的19%的患者住院时间明显短于其余患者(3.6天),而从医院转来的9%的患者住院时间明显更长(22.3天)。在395例出院患者中,如果没有GPHs,61%的患者被评估为上级医院的候选对象。45%的GPHs住院似乎替代了上级医院的入院。

结论

GPHs具有院前“缓冲”功能,通过短期观察住院防止有急性症状的患者不必要地入住综合医院。还证明了其院后功能,因为GPHs允许对从综合医院转来的患者进行长期随访住院。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验