Aaraas I
Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1995 Dec;13(4):250-6. doi: 10.3109/02813439508996771.
In a study assessing the role of general practitioner hospitals (GPHs) in the health service two main questions were addressed: 1) Are general practitioner beds used for short-term medical observations, or as a supplement for long-term geriatric care? 2) What are the alternatives to stays in GPHs?
In a prospective design GPH stays during 8 weeks were recorded.
15 GPH units in Finnmark county in Norway.
395 completed stays were recorded.
The patients' sex, age and diagnosis, flow of patients, length of stays, bed occupancy rate, and doctors' assessments of alternative level of care.
60% of the patients were admitted from and discharged to their home after a mean stay of 6.8 days. The 19% who were transferred to higher level hospitals stayed significantly shorter than the rest (3.6 days), while 9% transferred from hospital stayed significantly longer (22.3 days). Of the 395 patients discharged 61% were assessed as candidates for higher level hospitals, if GPHs did not exist. 45% of the GPH stays seem to replace higher level hospital admissions.
The GPHs have a pre-hospital "buffer" function by preventing patients with acute symptoms from being unnecessarily admitted to general hospitals through short-term observation stays. A post-hospital function was also demonstrated, since GPHs allow for long-term follow up stays for patients transferred from general hospitals.
在一项评估全科医生医院(GPHs)在医疗服务中作用的研究中,探讨了两个主要问题:1)全科医生病床是用于短期医疗观察,还是作为长期老年护理的补充?2)GPHs住院的替代方案有哪些?
采用前瞻性设计记录8周内的GPHs住院情况。
挪威芬马克郡的15个GPHs单位。
记录了395例完整的住院病例。
患者的性别、年龄和诊断、患者流量、住院时间、床位占用率以及医生对替代护理水平的评估。
60%的患者入院和出院均在家中,平均住院6.8天。转至上级医院的19%的患者住院时间明显短于其余患者(3.6天),而从医院转来的9%的患者住院时间明显更长(22.3天)。在395例出院患者中,如果没有GPHs,61%的患者被评估为上级医院的候选对象。45%的GPHs住院似乎替代了上级医院的入院。
GPHs具有院前“缓冲”功能,通过短期观察住院防止有急性症状的患者不必要地入住综合医院。还证明了其院后功能,因为GPHs允许对从综合医院转来的患者进行长期随访住院。