Genoni M, Sessa F, Pasotti E, Malacrida R, Maggioni A, Moccetti T
Clinica Medica, Ospedale Civico, Lugano.
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1996 Jun 1;126(22):967-73.
As part of the ISIS study, the prehospitalization phase in 570 patients with acute myocardial infarction was evaluated and protocolled in 34 Swiss hospitals. The aim was to assess whether the time lapse between onset of pain symptoms and start of treatment could be shortened. It was felt that, particularly in the case of lethal cardiac arrhythmias, rapid intervention could secure reversal or controlled relief of symptoms and/or conduction disorders. The study protocol recorded the specific time lapses between onset of symptoms and notification of the physician, notification of the physician and hospital admission, and between hospital admission and therapeutic action. The longest time lapse observed was the patient's delay (57%). Delay by the patient was shortened when pain symptoms (a) occurred during daytime, (b) were preceded by symptoms in the week before the infarction, (c) occurred at work, and (d) occurred during exercise, particularly in the company of unknown persons. The longest time lapse observed in hospital was associated with the night shift. The time lost through delay in contacting a doctor, the main factor in delaying therapeutic action in acute myocardial infarction, is very difficult to influence since the target group for a public information campaign is hard to identify. On the other hand, the "door to needle" time lapse observed in hospital can be reduced by the introduction of clear-cut guidelines.
作为 ISIS 研究的一部分,在瑞士 34 家医院对 570 例急性心肌梗死患者的院前阶段进行了评估并制定了方案。目的是评估能否缩短疼痛症状发作与开始治疗之间的时间间隔。人们认为,特别是在致死性心律失常的情况下,快速干预可确保症状和/或传导障碍得到逆转或得到控制缓解。研究方案记录了症状发作与通知医生、通知医生与住院、住院与采取治疗措施之间的具体时间间隔。观察到的最长时间间隔是患者延误(57%)。当疼痛症状(a)在白天出现、(b)在梗死前一周有前驱症状、(c)在工作时出现、(d)在运动时出现,特别是在有陌生人在场时,患者的延误时间会缩短。在医院观察到的最长时间间隔与夜班有关。联系医生延误所造成的时间损失是急性心肌梗死治疗行动延误的主要因素,由于很难确定公共宣传活动的目标群体,因此很难对此加以影响。另一方面,通过引入明确的指导方针,可以缩短在医院观察到的“门到针”时间间隔。