Lee J S, Nam J H, Lee M C, Park C S, Juhng S W
Department of Pathology, Chonnam University Medical School, Kwangju, Seoul, Korea.
Acta Cytol. 1996 Jul-Aug;40(4):631-6. doi: 10.1159/000333930.
This study was designed to assess whether a new panel of antibodies is a useful adjunct in the differential diagnosis of carcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells.
Complete, one-hour immunohistochemistry using antibodies against cytokeratin (CK), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and fibronectin was applied to cell blocks from 76 pleural and peritoneal fluid specimens. Fifty patients with histologically diagnosed primary carcinomas and 26 without evidence of malignancy were included. The results were correlated with routine cytologic results.
The final cytologic diagnoses were 28 malignant effusions and 48 benign effusions. CEA and EMA were present in 25 (89%) and 24 (86%) of 28 carcinoma cases, respectively. These determinants were absent from reactive mesothelial cells. Fibronectin strongly labeled reactive mesothelial cells, with no staining of carcinoma cells. Carcinoma cells expressed at least two antibodies to CK, CEA and EMA and were negative to fibronectin. Reactive mesothelial cells expressed both CK and fibronectin. In 6 of 28 carcinoma cases (21%) the immunohistochemical panel identified carcinoma cells that were not recognized initially on routine cytologic examination.
A panel of CEA, EMA and fibronectin monoclonal antibodies appears to be suitable for distinguishing between carcinoma cells and reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusions.
本研究旨在评估一组新的抗体是否有助于癌与反应性间皮细胞的鉴别诊断。
采用针对细胞角蛋白(CK)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、上皮膜抗原(EMA)和纤连蛋白的抗体进行1小时的完整免疫组织化学检测,应用于76例胸腔和腹腔积液标本的细胞块。纳入50例经组织学诊断为原发性癌的患者和26例无恶性证据的患者。将结果与常规细胞学结果进行关联。
最终细胞学诊断为28例恶性积液和48例良性积液。28例癌病例中,CEA和EMA分别在25例(89%)和24例(86%)中出现。反应性间皮细胞中不存在这些标志物。纤连蛋白强烈标记反应性间皮细胞,癌细胞无染色。癌细胞表达至少两种针对CK、CEA和EMA的抗体,对纤连蛋白呈阴性。反应性间皮细胞同时表达CK和纤连蛋白。在28例癌病例中的6例(21%),免疫组织化学检测发现了常规细胞学检查最初未识别的癌细胞。
一组CEA、EMA和纤连蛋白单克隆抗体似乎适用于区分浆液性积液中的癌细胞和反应性间皮细胞。