Mehta R C, Pike G B, Enzmann D R
Department of Radiology, Stanford (Calif) University School of Medicine 94305-5105, USA.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995 Oct;16(9):1771-8.
To determine whether magnetization transfer imaging can improve visibility of contrast enhancement of multiple sclerosis plaques.
Fifty-nine enhancing and 63 nonenhancing lesions in 10 patients with multiple sclerosis were evaluated to calculate contrast-to-noise ratios on conventional T1-weighted and T1-weighted magnetization transfer images. The signal intensity of the lesion and the background (white matter) were measured on precontrast T1-weighted and T1-weighted magnetization transfer images (800/20/1 [repetition time/echo time/excitations]) and on postcontrast T1-weighted and T1-weighted magnetization transfer images. Mean contrast-to-noise ratios was calculated for all lesions.
The contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher for enhancing and nonenhancing lesions on T1-weighted magnetization transfer images than on conventional T1-weighted images. For enhancing lesions, the contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher on postcontrast T1-weighted magnetization transfer images, 32 +/- 2 compared with 21 +/- 2 on conventional T1-weighted images. Fifty of the 59 enhancing lesions were seen on both the T1-weighted and the T1-weighted magnetization transfer images. Nine enhancing lesions were seen only on the postcontrast T1-weighted magnetization transfer images. In addition, of 63 nonenhancing lesions seen on proton-density, T2-weighted, and T1-weighted magnetization transfer images, 16 were not seen on the conventional T1-weighted images. Seven of the 63 nonenhancing lesions and 7 of the 59 enhancing lesions had high signal intensity on the precontrast T1-weighted magnetization transfer images suggestive of lipid signal, a finding not seen on the conventional precontrast T1-weighted images.
Magnetization transfer improves the visibility of enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions, because they have a higher contrast-to-noise ratio than conventional postcontrast T1-weighted images. High signal intensity on both nonenhancing and enhancing lesions noted only on precontrast T1-weighted magnetization transfer suggests a lipid signal was unmasked. If magnetization transfer is used in multiple sclerosis patients, a precontrast magnetization transfer image is necessary.
确定磁化传递成像是否能提高多发性硬化斑块对比增强的可视性。
对10例多发性硬化患者的59个强化病灶和63个非强化病灶进行评估,以计算常规T1加权像和T1加权磁化传递像上的对比噪声比。在对比剂注射前的T1加权像和T1加权磁化传递像(800/20/1[重复时间/回波时间/激励次数])以及对比剂注射后的T1加权像和T1加权磁化传递像上测量病灶和背景(白质)的信号强度。计算所有病灶的平均对比噪声比。
T1加权磁化传递像上强化和非强化病灶的对比噪声比显著高于常规T1加权像。对于强化病灶,对比剂注射后T1加权磁化传递像上的对比噪声比显著更高,为32±2,而常规T1加权像上为21±2。59个强化病灶中有50个在T1加权像和T1加权磁化传递像上均可见。9个强化病灶仅在对比剂注射后T1加权磁化传递像上可见。此外,在质子密度像、T2加权像和T1加权磁化传递像上可见的63个非强化病灶中,16个在常规T1加权像上不可见。63个非强化病灶中的7个和59个强化病灶中的7个在对比剂注射前T1加权磁化传递像上具有高信号强度,提示脂质信号,这一发现未见于常规对比剂注射前T1加权像。
磁化传递提高了强化的多发性硬化病灶的可视性,因为它们的对比噪声比高于常规对比剂注射后T1加权像。仅在对比剂注射前T1加权磁化传递像上观察到非强化和强化病灶均有高信号强度,提示脂质信号被显示出来。如果在多发性硬化患者中使用磁化传递成像,对比剂注射前的磁化传递像是必要的。