• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

New markers for breast carcinoma-associated antigen in comparison with CA 15-3.

作者信息

van Dalen A

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 1996 Jul-Aug;16(4B):2339-43.

PMID:8694566
Abstract

The objective of this study was the clinical comparison of newly developed antibodies used in commercially available test systems with CA 15-3 (CIS bio international). IMMULITE BR-MA is a sequential chemoluminescent assay using the Mab's Ma552 and Ma695. Truquant BR RIA is a competitive inhibition radioimmunoassay using the Mab B27.29. ELSA-CA 15-3 is a sequential immunoradiometric assay using the Mab's115D8 and DF3. In the study 32 breast cancer patients (206 serum samples) were included during therapy monitoring. Linear regression analysis was performed with the CA 15-3 test as the reference method. Clinical criteria of response were according to UICC). Regression analysis in the range 0-1000 kU/l revealed the equations: IMMULITE = 1.65CIS + 0.87 (r = 0.78) and Truquant = 1.16 CIS + 10.6 (r = 0.95). The upper reference level of normal controls were somewhat higher than using the CIS method (30 kU/l): IMMULITE and TRUQUANT 40 kU/l and 36 kU/l, respectively. In all patients (except in 1 serum sample) nearly complete parallel tumour marker changes were seen with only minimal discrepancies in a few patients. However, the average factor between different patients varied between 0.51-6.9 (IMMULITE) and 0.74-2.3 (Truquant). In comparison to UICC criteria no discrepancies were observed. Therefore, we concluded that the test systems from DPC and BIOMIRA for the CA 15-3 antigen can replace the CIS test. Patient results were not interchangable. All test systems followed the clinical course of the disease in the same way.

摘要

相似文献

1
New markers for breast carcinoma-associated antigen in comparison with CA 15-3.
Anticancer Res. 1996 Jul-Aug;16(4B):2339-43.
2
[Immunoradiometric assay of tumor marker CA15-3 and its clinical application].肿瘤标志物CA15-3的免疫放射分析及其临床应用
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 1998 Mar;20(2):125-8.
3
Clinical evaluation of the Elecsys CA 15-3 test in breast cancer patients.Elecsys CA 15-3检测在乳腺癌患者中的临床评估
Clin Lab. 2003;49(1-2):15-24.
4
Evaluation of the IMMULITE BR-MA and CEA assays and comparison with immunoradiometric assays for CA15-3 and CEA in breast cancer.免疫发光法检测乳腺癌中BR-MA和癌胚抗原(CEA)的评估以及与CA15-3和CEA免疫放射分析的比较
Anticancer Res. 1997 May-Jun;17(3C):1945-9.
5
A multicentre evaluation of tumour marker determinations using the automatic Enzymun-Test Systems ES 300 and ES 600/700.使用自动酶免疫分析系统ES 300和ES 600/700对肿瘤标志物检测进行的多中心评估。
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1996 Apr;34(4):377-84.
6
A comparative study of four serological tumor markers for the detection of breast cancer.四种用于检测乳腺癌的血清学肿瘤标志物的比较研究。
Biomed Sci Instrum. 2003;39:408-14.
7
Ca 15.3 in breast cancer: comparison of two assays and validation in a Mexican population.
Arch Med Res. 1997 Winter;28(4):523-6.
8
Comparison of TPS with CEA and CA 15.3 in follow-up of Chinese breast cancer patients.中国乳腺癌患者随访中 TPS 与癌胚抗原(CEA)及糖类抗原 15.3(CA 15.3)的比较
Anticancer Res. 2002 May-Jun;22(3):1865-8.
9
CA 15-3: a multicentre evaluation of automated and manual tests.CA 15-3:自动化与手动检测的多中心评估
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1996 Jan;34(1):77-84.
10
Multicentre tumour marker reference range study.多中心肿瘤标志物参考范围研究。
Anticancer Res. 1999 Jul-Aug;19(4A):2749-52.