Suppr超能文献

角膜敏感性与烧灼感。局部用酮咯酸与双氯芬酸的比较。

Corneal sensitivity and burning sensation. Comparing topical ketorolac and diclofenac.

作者信息

Seitz B, Sorken K, LaBree L D, Garbus J J, McDonnell P J

机构信息

Doheny Eye Institute, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

Arch Ophthalmol. 1996 Aug;114(8):921-4. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140129002.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of topical 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine and 0.1% diclofenac sodium on human corneal sensitivity and to assess the intensity of burning sensation at specific intervals after drop instillation.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Double-masked parallel clinical study.

PATIENTS

Eleven women and 4 men (8 white, 4 Hispanic, 3 Asian), 22 to 60 years of age (mean [ +/- SD], 34 +/- 10 years).

INTERVENTIONS

Repeated instillation of either ketorolac and placebo or diclofenac and placebo at 5-minute intervals.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Assessment of corneal sensitivity before instillation, immediately after instillation, and after termination of drop application; and subjective evaluation of burning sensation by asking participants to rate burning on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) after each drop application.

RESULTS

Both diclofenac (P < .01) and ketorolac (P < .01) decreased corneal sensitivity significantly, while the placebo had no measurable effect. After administration of additional drops over time, the effect of diclofenac and ketorolac increased. After termination of the drug instillation, corneal sensitivity returned to baseline significantly slower (P < .01) in participants receiving diclofenac than in those receiving ketorolac. Ketorolac (P = .01) and diclofenac (P < .05) were significantly more effective in whites than in nonwhites. Mean burning sensation was mild, and there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 drugs on this measure (P = .12).

CONCLUSIONS

The decrease in corneal sensitivity in normal human corneas is more pronounced and longer lasting with diclofenac than with ketorolac. Both drugs are well tolerated topically and may be useful for pain reduction after refractive corneal surgery.

摘要

目的

比较局部应用0.5%酮咯酸氨丁三醇和0.1%双氯芬酸钠对人角膜敏感性的影响,并评估滴药后特定时间间隔的烧灼感强度。

设计与地点

双盲平行临床研究。

患者

11名女性和4名男性(8名白人、4名西班牙裔、3名亚洲人),年龄22至60岁(平均[±标准差],34±10岁)。

干预措施

每隔5分钟重复滴入酮咯酸和安慰剂或双氯芬酸和安慰剂。

主要观察指标

滴药前、滴药后即刻及停药后的角膜敏感性评估;通过让参与者在每次滴药后按0(无)至3(严重)的等级对烧灼感进行评分来主观评估烧灼感。

结果

双氯芬酸(P < 0.01)和酮咯酸(P < 0.01)均显著降低角膜敏感性,而安慰剂无明显作用。随着时间推移额外滴药后,双氯芬酸和酮咯酸的作用增强。停药后,接受双氯芬酸的参与者角膜敏感性恢复至基线的速度明显慢于接受酮咯酸的参与者(P < 0.01)。酮咯酸(P = 0.01)和双氯芬酸(P < 0.05)对白人的效果显著优于非白人。平均烧灼感较轻,两种药物在该指标上无统计学显著差异(P = 0.12)。

结论

在正常人类角膜中,双氯芬酸导致的角膜敏感性降低比酮咯酸更明显且持续时间更长。两种药物局部耐受性良好,可能对角膜屈光手术后的疼痛减轻有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验