Suppr超能文献

用于除菌级过滤器细菌截留测试的回收过滤器评估。

Evaluation of recovery filters for use in bacterial retention testing of sterilizing-grade filters.

作者信息

Carter J

机构信息

BioProcess Division, Millipore Corporation, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 1996 May-Jun;50(3):147-53.

PMID:8696777
Abstract

Membrane filters with pore-size ratings of 0.22 microns and 0.45 microns were tested for their ability to recover Pseudomonas diminuta ATCC 19146 (P. diminuta), the organism typically used in bacterial retention testing of sterilizing-grade membrane filters. For each of the two pore-size ratings, filters of two membrane filter polymer materials, hydrophilic PVDF (Millipore Durapore) and mixed esters of cellulose, were tested, resulting in an evaluation of four potential recovery filters. The 0.45 microns mixed esters of cellulose filter is the currently accepted membrane for this purpose. The data show no difference in the ability of the four filters to recover freshly cultured P. diminuta. Moreover, the membrane-filter method was shown to provide a very high bacterial-recovery efficiency, equivalent to that of the spread-plate method. Thus, 0.22 micron filters, despite their ability to retain higher levels of bacteria, proved not to have an advantage over 0.45 micron membranes in terms of bacterial recovery. This result, combined with (1) the knowledge that more open membranes have been shown experimentally to more efficiently recover stressed organisms; (2) the potential to produce stressed cells in an actual bacterial retention test; and (3) the long history of the successful use of 0.45 microns mixed esters of cellulose for bacterial recovery, support the continued use of the 0.45 micron filter in this application.

摘要

对孔径额定值为0.22微米和0.45微米的膜过滤器进行了测试,以评估其回收短小假单胞菌ATCC 19146(P. diminuta)的能力,该微生物通常用于除菌级膜过滤器的细菌截留测试。对于这两种孔径额定值中的每一种,测试了两种膜过滤聚合物材料的过滤器,即亲水性聚偏二氟乙烯(密理博Durapore)和纤维素混合酯,从而对四种潜在的回收过滤器进行了评估。0.45微米的纤维素混合酯过滤器是目前为此目的所接受的膜。数据表明,这四种过滤器回收新鲜培养的P. diminuta的能力没有差异。此外,膜过滤法显示出非常高的细菌回收效率,与平板涂布法相当。因此,0.22微米的过滤器尽管能够截留更高水平的细菌,但在细菌回收方面并未证明比0.45微米的膜具有优势。这一结果,结合(1)实验表明更开放的膜能更有效地回收受胁迫微生物的知识;(2)在实际细菌截留测试中产生受胁迫细胞的可能性;以及(3)0.45微米纤维素混合酯在细菌回收方面长期成功使用的历史,支持了在该应用中继续使用0.45微米过滤器。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验