• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于对一线治疗无反应的发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者,万古霉素联合亚胺培南、头孢他啶或环丙沙星用于二线治疗。

Vancomycin plus imipenem ceftazidime or ciprofloxacin in second line therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia not responding to first line therapy.

作者信息

Lacka J, Oravcova E, Sevcikova L, Studena M, Bachanova V, Kukuckova E, Spanik S, Sufliarsky J, Helpianska L, Trupl J, Kunova A, Vochyanova I, Sycova Z, Grey E, Krcméry V

机构信息

Department of Chemotherapy, Postgraduate Medical School, Bratislava, Republic of Slovakia.

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 1996 Mar-Apr;42(2):146-9. doi: 10.1159/000239434.

DOI:10.1159/000239434
PMID:8697890
Abstract

137 patients with febrile neutropenia after cytotoxic therapy not responding to ceftazidime plus or ceftriaxone plus netilmicin in received additionally to the previous combination either vancomycin alone or combined with another anti-gram-negative compound: imipenem in those treated prophylactically with ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in those without prophylaxis. The addition of vancomycin to the previously ineffective combination of a third generation cephalosporin plus aminoglycoside, and replacement of ceftriaxone plus netilmicin with ceftazidime plus amikacin plus vancomycin or with ceftazidime plus vancomycin seems to be less effective (71.8-75 vs. 87.5-90.9%, p < 0.02) and more toxic (20.5-7.2 vs. 0-5%, p < 0.0005) than vancomycin in combination with a different anti-gram-negative compound as previously used: imipenem or ciprofloxacin.

摘要

137例细胞毒性治疗后出现发热性中性粒细胞减少且对头孢他啶加或头孢曲松加奈替米星无反应的患者,在先前联合用药基础上,要么单独加用万古霉素,要么与另一种抗革兰阴性菌化合物联合使用:接受氧氟沙星预防性治疗的患者加用亚胺培南,未进行预防性治疗的患者加用环丙沙星。在先前无效的第三代头孢菌素加氨基糖苷类联合用药基础上加用万古霉素,以及用头孢他啶加阿米卡星加万古霉素或头孢他啶加万古霉素替代头孢曲松加奈替米星,似乎比万古霉素与先前使用的不同抗革兰阴性菌化合物(亚胺培南或环丙沙星)联合使用效果更差(71.8 - 75%对87.5 - 90.9%,p < 0.02)且毒性更大(20.5 - 7.2%对0 - 5%,p < 0.0005)。

相似文献

1
Vancomycin plus imipenem ceftazidime or ciprofloxacin in second line therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia not responding to first line therapy.对于对一线治疗无反应的发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者,万古霉素联合亚胺培南、头孢他啶或环丙沙星用于二线治疗。
Chemotherapy. 1996 Mar-Apr;42(2):146-9. doi: 10.1159/000239434.
2
Imipenem compared with ceftazidime plus vancomycin as initial therapy for fever in neutropenic children with cancer.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991 Dec;10(12):918-23. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199112000-00008.
3
[Evaluation of three types of empirical antibiotherapy in patients with febrile neutropenia: imipenem-cilastatin versus ceftazidime-vancomycin versus ticarcillin-amikacin-vancomycin].[三种经验性抗菌疗法用于发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的评估:亚胺培南-西司他丁对比头孢他啶-万古霉素对比替卡西林-阿米卡星-万古霉素]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1992 Oct;40(8):797-804.
4
[Imipenem/cilastatin versus ceftazidime-amikacin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients].亚胺培南/西司他丁与头孢他啶-阿米卡星治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的对比研究
Rev Med Chil. 1995 Mar;123(3):312-20.
5
Cost-effectiveness of ceftazidime or imipenem/cilastatin versus ceftriaxone + aminoglycoside in the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients in Germany.德国头孢他啶或亚胺培南/西司他丁与头孢曲松+氨基糖苷类药物治疗中性粒细胞减少癌症患者发热性发作的成本效益
Infection. 1999 Jan-Feb;27(1):23-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02565166.
6
Randomized trial comparing netilmicin plus imipenem-cilastatin versus netilmicin plus ceftazidime as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenic bone marrow transplant recipients.比较奈替米星加亚胺培南-西司他丁与奈替米星加头孢他啶作为发热性中性粒细胞减少症骨髓移植受者经验性治疗的随机试验。
J Chemother. 1997 Apr;9(2):95-101. doi: 10.1179/joc.1997.9.2.95.
7
A comparison of aztreonam plus vancomycin and imipenem plus vancomycin as initial therapy for febrile neutropenic cancer patients.
Cancer. 1996 Apr 1;77(7):1386-94. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960401)77:7<1386::AID-CNCR25>3.0.CO;2-X.
8
Monotherapy for fever and neutropenia in cancer patients: a randomized comparison of ceftazidime versus imipenem.癌症患者发热伴中性粒细胞减少的单药治疗:头孢他啶与亚胺培南的随机对照比较
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jan;13(1):165-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.1.165.
9
A comparison of imipenem to ceftazidime with or without amikacin as empiric therapy in febrile neutropenic patients.在发热性中性粒细胞减少患者中,将亚胺培南与头孢他啶联用或不联用阿米卡星作为经验性治疗的比较。
Arch Intern Med. 1992 Feb;152(2):283-91.
10
Neutropenic infections: a review of the French Febrile Aplasia Study Group trials in 608 febrile neutropenic patients.中性粒细胞减少性感染:法国发热性再生障碍研究组对608例发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的试验综述
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998 Jun;41 Suppl D:57-64. doi: 10.1093/jac/41.suppl_4.57.