Gournay K, Brooking J
Institute of Psychiatry, University of London, England.
J Adv Nurs. 1995 Oct;22(4):769-78. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22040769.x.
Community psychiatric nurses (CPNs) in the United Kingdom are increasingly working in primary health care settings with less serious mental health problems. This paper describes an economic evaluation of their work using a randomized controlled trial in which 231 patients were assigned to continuing general practitioner care or one of two conditions of CPN intervention. This is only the third systematic economic analysis of community mental health nursing in the UK and the first carried out by mental health nurses. Various costs to patients, their families and the health care system were determined. Results showed that patients receiving CPN intervention experienced less absence from work and that this resulted in a net benefit. However, the cost per quality adjusted life year for intervening with this group of patients was probably several times more than for intervening with the seriously mentally ill. Therefore, if one considers both the clinical and economic results of the study, taken together with the recent results of the review of mental health nursing, there seems little justification for CPNs continuing to work in this area.
英国的社区精神科护士(CPNs)越来越多地在初级卫生保健机构中处理不太严重的心理健康问题。本文描述了一项对他们工作的经济评估,该评估采用随机对照试验,将231名患者分配至继续接受全科医生护理或两种CPN干预条件之一。这是英国对社区精神卫生护理进行的第三次系统经济分析,也是首次由精神科护士开展的此类分析。确定了患者、其家庭和医疗保健系统的各种成本。结果显示,接受CPN干预的患者旷工情况较少,这带来了净效益。然而,干预这组患者每获得一个质量调整生命年的成本可能比对严重精神疾病患者进行干预的成本高出几倍。因此,如果综合考虑该研究的临床和经济结果,再结合近期精神卫生护理综述的结果,CPNs继续在这一领域工作似乎没有什么正当理由。