Brooker C, Butterworth C
Department of Nursing, University of Manchester, U.K.
Int J Nurs Stud. 1991;28(2):189-200. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(91)90008-q.
This paper describes the effect on the role and function of the community psychiatric nurse (CPN) after training to deliver psychosocial intervention to families caring for a relative with schizophrenia living at home. The study was undertaken as part of a larger investigation, commissioned by the Department of Health, which is examining outcome in families after CPNs have received training in psychosocial intervention strategies. In the last decade four major controlled studies have shown that relapse in schizophrenia can be improved if families receive; detailed assessments of individual need, health education about schizophrenia, and family stress management programmes, often defined as "psychosocial intervention". Whilst these research programmes have been underway, CPN services have been developing closer links with Primary Health Care and individual CPN's work with clients with severe and long-term mental illness has, as a consequence, been reducing. This trend has been rightly criticized, as has the tendency for CPN work to focus on the individual rather than the family with whom the client often lives. Informal carers willingly accept the burden of care for their relatives but their own needs are all too often neglected. The pilot phase of the outcome study demonstrated that after CPNs had received experimental training in psychosocial intervention, families reported a number of positive benefits when followed up for 12 months. First, for the clients there were improvements in the symptoms of their illness and in their social functioning. Second, carers' satisfaction with the service received showed a marked improvement as did their estimates of minor psychiatric morbidity. These changes in outcome entailed a cost. Experimental CPNs reported that undertaking family intervention was more time-consuming than "traditional" CPN care of the client with schizophrenia. Further, the data reveal that the training led to CPNs extending their role in a variety of other ways even though they received only a modicum of support from colleagues within their own health authorities. This preliminary paper concludes that although family work undertaken by CPNs should be seen as an important priority, problems may arise as services attempt to juggle finite resources with ever growing demands. Guidance on the future role of the CPN from the Department of Health is essential and would greatly enable planners and managers alike to rank order service priorities.
本文描述了社区精神科护士(CPN)在接受培训以向在家照料精神分裂症亲属的家庭提供心理社会干预后,其角色和功能所受到的影响。该研究是作为卫生部委托开展的一项更大规模调查的一部分进行的,该调查正在考察CPN接受心理社会干预策略培训后家庭的情况。在过去十年中,四项主要的对照研究表明,如果家庭接受以下内容,精神分裂症的复发情况可以得到改善:对个体需求的详细评估、关于精神分裂症的健康教育以及家庭压力管理项目,这些通常被定义为“心理社会干预”。在这些研究项目进行的同时,CPN服务与初级医疗保健建立了更紧密的联系,结果是CPN与患有严重和长期精神疾病的患者的工作减少了。这种趋势受到了合理的批评,CPN工作倾向于关注个体而非与患者共同生活的家庭这一倾向也受到了批评。非正式照料者愿意承担照料亲属的负担,但他们自己的需求却常常被忽视。结果研究的试点阶段表明,CPN接受心理社会干预的实验性培训后,在随访12个月时,家庭报告了许多积极的益处。首先,对于患者来说,他们的病情症状和社会功能有了改善。其次,照料者对所接受服务的满意度有了显著提高,他们对轻微精神疾病发病率的估计也是如此。这些结果的变化是有成本的。参与实验的CPN报告称,开展家庭干预比“传统”CPN对精神分裂症患者的护理更耗时。此外,数据显示,尽管CPN在自己的卫生部门内仅从同事那里获得了少量支持,但培训使他们在其他各种方面扩展了自己的角色。这篇初步论文得出结论,尽管CPN开展的家庭工作应被视为一项重要的优先事项,但随着服务机构试图在有限资源与不断增长的需求之间进行平衡,可能会出现问题。卫生部对CPN未来角色的指导至关重要,这将极大地帮助规划者和管理者等对服务优先事项进行排序。