Schnetz K, Wang J C
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Jun 15;24(12):2422-8. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.12.2422.
Regulation of the Escherichia coli bgl promoter involves the catabolite gene activator protein (CAP) and silencer elements that are located upstream and downstream of the promoter and its CAP binding site. The promoter is kept in a repressed state by the silencer elements and other normally active CAP-dependent or -independent promoters are repressed as well when flanked by these elements. To assess the mechanism of promoter repression, single round in vitro transcription was carried out with plasmids bearing either the wild-type bgl promoter or one of two derivatives that escape repression in vivo by different mechanisms: C234 by improving the CAP binding site of the promoter and delta1 by a deletion within the upstream silencer sequence. Repression of the bgl promoter in vitro was shown to depend on template topology and the presence of cellular factors. With negatively supercoiled templates, all three promoters are transcribed to similar extents by purified E. coli RNA polymerase and no CAP dependence is apparent; with relaxed templates, transcription is CAP dependent, but the levels of transcription of the three promoters are comparable. Addition of crude cell extract to the simple transcription system leads to repression of all three promoter alleles in the absence of CAP. Repression of the mutant alleles but not of the wild-type promoter is completely relieved in the presence of the CAP-cAMP complex. The topology of the DNA template is also important in the differential regulation of these promoters. In the case of C234, repression by cell extract is completely relieved by CAP-cAMP on relaxed or negatively supercoiled templates, while complete derepression of delta1 by CAP-cAMP occurs on negatively supercoiled templates only. Repression by cell extract requires the presence of the histone-like protein H-NS. However, H-NS alone does not appear to be sufficient for specific silencing of the wild-type promoter, since repression of all three promoter alleles caused by purified H-NS protein is completely relieved by the CAP-cAMP complex. These data suggest that template topology, H-NS and other cellular factors are involved in the formation of a specific nucleoprotein structure in the bgl promoter-silencer region; the formation of this nucleoprotein structure keeps an otherwise active promoter in an inactive state.
大肠杆菌bgl启动子的调控涉及分解代谢基因激活蛋白(CAP)以及位于启动子及其CAP结合位点上下游的沉默子元件。沉默子元件使启动子处于抑制状态,当其他正常活性的CAP依赖性或非依赖性启动子两侧有这些元件时,它们也会被抑制。为了评估启动子抑制的机制,使用携带野生型bgl启动子或通过不同机制在体内逃避抑制的两种衍生物之一的质粒进行了单轮体外转录:C234通过改善启动子的CAP结合位点,delta1通过上游沉默子序列内的缺失。结果表明,bgl启动子在体外的抑制取决于模板拓扑结构和细胞因子的存在。对于负超螺旋模板,纯化的大肠杆菌RNA聚合酶对所有三种启动子的转录程度相似,且未表现出对CAP的依赖性;对于松弛模板,转录依赖于CAP,但三种启动子的转录水平相当。向简单转录系统中添加粗细胞提取物会导致在没有CAP的情况下所有三种启动子等位基因都受到抑制。在存在CAP-cAMP复合物的情况下,突变等位基因的抑制被完全解除,但野生型启动子不受影响。DNA模板的拓扑结构在这些启动子的差异调控中也很重要。就C234而言,细胞提取物的抑制在松弛或负超螺旋模板上都能被CAP-cAMP完全解除,而delta1仅在负超螺旋模板上能被CAP-cAMP完全去抑制。细胞提取物的抑制需要组蛋白样蛋白H-NS的存在。然而,单独的H-NS似乎不足以特异性沉默野生型启动子,因为纯化的H-NS蛋白引起的所有三种启动子等位基因的抑制都能被CAP-cAMP复合物完全解除。这些数据表明,模板拓扑结构、H-NS和其他细胞因子参与了bgl启动子-沉默子区域中特定核蛋白结构的形成;这种核蛋白结构的形成使原本活跃的启动子处于非活性状态。