Suppr超能文献

[螺旋CT血管造影术在中央型肺栓塞诊断中的应用:与肺血管造影术及闪烁扫描术的比较]

[Spiral CT angiography in the diagnosis of central pulmonary embolism: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy].

作者信息

Cauvain O, Rémy-Jardin M, Rémy J, Petyt L, Beregi J P, Steinling M, Duhamel A

机构信息

Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Calmette, Lille.

出版信息

Rev Mal Respir. 1996;13(2):141-53.

PMID:8711233
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of spiral CT angiography in the diagnosis of central pulmonary embolism (PE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was undertaken in a population of 90 patients who were evaluated with spiral CT angiography (acquisition: 12 to 24 s with or without strict apnea; injection of 90 cm3 of 12, 20 or 30% contrast material at a rate of 4 to 7 cm3, selective pulmonary angiography of each lung (n = 55) and/or ventilation-perfusion (VP) scanning (n = 35).

RESULTS

Among the 55 patients evaluated with both spiral CT and angiography, central pulmonary embolism was excluded in 19 patients (34%), assessed in 29 patients (53%) whereas CT examination was considered as inconclusive in 7 patients (13%) due to interpretive difficulties at the level of obliquely oriented arteries and/or presence of hilar lymph nodes (sensitivity: 90.5%; specificity: 82.6%). With spiral CT, the finding of 95 central emboli (3 main, 61 lobar and 31 segmental) corresponded exactly to the angiographic findings; spiral CT enabled direct visualization of intraluminal filling defects (n = 95) whereas the angiographic recognition of PE was based on direct (n = 57) and indirect (n = 38) signs. Spiral CT angiography was more sensitive and specific than VP scanning.

CONCLUSION

Spiral CT angiography appears as a sensitive and specific noninvasive method for the diagnosis of central PE.

摘要

目的

评估螺旋CT血管造影在诊断中心型肺栓塞(PE)中的准确性。

材料与方法

对90例患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者接受了螺旋CT血管造影检查(采集时间:12至24秒,屏气或不屏气;以4至7立方厘米/秒的速率注射90立方厘米的12%、20%或30%造影剂),对每个肺进行选择性肺血管造影(n = 55)和/或通气灌注(VP)扫描(n = 35)。

结果

在55例同时接受螺旋CT和血管造影检查的患者中,19例(34%)排除了中心型肺栓塞,29例(53%)评估为有肺栓塞,而7例(13%)因斜行动脉层面的解读困难和/或肺门淋巴结的存在,CT检查结果被认为不确定(敏感性:90.5%;特异性:82.6%)。螺旋CT发现的95个中心型栓子(3个主肺动脉、61个叶动脉和31个段动脉)与血管造影结果完全相符;螺旋CT能够直接显示腔内充盈缺损(n = 95),而血管造影对PE的识别基于直接(n = 57)和间接(n = 38)征象。螺旋CT血管造影比VP扫描更敏感和特异。

结论

螺旋CT血管造影似乎是一种诊断中心型PE的敏感且特异的非侵入性方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验