Sullivan T C, Turpin D L, Artun J
Department of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.
Angle Orthod. 1996;66(2):131-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1996)066<0131:APSOPP>2.3.CO;2.
The purpose of this study was to assess postretention stability of maxillary midline diastema closure, to search for predictors of relapse, and to test for associations between relapse and other postretention changes. The sample consisted of 35 patients with pretreatment diastemas ranging from 0.9 mm to 3.0 mm (mean 1.4, SD = 0.5) following eruption of the maxillary canines. Data were gathered from treatment charts, study models, periapical radiographs, and cephalograms taken pretreatment, posttreatment, and 1 to 26 years postretention (mean 11.4, SD = 6.4). Measurable diastema relapse was observed in only 12 cases. The majority of the relapse was 0.6 mm or less, and maximum relapse was 3.0 mm. Abnormal frenums and/or intermaxillary osseous clefts did not appear to be risk factors for relapse, and no pretreatment predictors of relapse could be established. The only posttreatment change associated with diastema relapse was proclination of the maxillary incisors (p < 0.01).
本研究的目的是评估上颌中线间隙关闭后的保持稳定性,寻找复发的预测因素,并测试复发与其他保持后变化之间的关联。样本包括35例患者,在上颌尖牙萌出后,治疗前的间隙范围为0.9毫米至3.0毫米(平均1.4,标准差=0.5)。数据收集自治疗图表、研究模型、根尖片以及治疗前、治疗后和保持后1至26年(平均11.4,标准差=6.4)拍摄的头颅侧位片。仅在12例中观察到可测量的间隙复发。大多数复发为0.6毫米或更小,最大复发为3.0毫米。异常系带和/或颌间骨裂似乎不是复发的危险因素,且无法确定治疗前的复发预测因素。与间隙复发相关的唯一治疗后变化是上颌切牙前倾(p<0.01)。