Boyle M, Kenney C, Butcher R
Aust Crit Care. 1995 Sep;8(3):10-6. doi: 10.1016/s1036-7314(95)70284-3.
The Basic knowledge Assessment Tool (BKAT), a test developed in the United States, has been presented as a valid and reliable test of basic knowledge for critical care nursing. However, it was necessary to determine the BKAT's validity and reliability in the Australian intensive care (IC) context. The Delphi technique, utilising a panel of eleven experts, was used to determine the content validity of the BKAT. The Delphi process resulted in the development of a test with 105 questions. These questions consist of 49 original BKAT questions, 25 original BKAT questions slightly modified, 3 original BKAT questions with major modifications and 28 new questions. A criterion group design was used to establish the modified test's reliability and decision validity. Item analysis was undertaken using item difficulty and item discrimination indexes. The modified test was completed by 14 registered nurses with no IC experience, 18 registered nurses with intermediate IC experience and 25 registered nurses qualified as intensive care specialists. The mean score (and standard deviation) for the test for each of the respective groups was 41(9), 69(9) and 86(7). These results were significantly different (p < 0001). The reliability was established with a Cronbach Alpha coefficient of .96. The modified test is a reliable and valid measure of IC basic knowledge and can be used as a valuable adjunct in the assessment of IC orientation programs.
基础知识评估工具(BKAT)是美国开发的一项测试,已被视为对重症监护护理基础知识的有效且可靠的测试。然而,有必要确定BKAT在澳大利亚重症监护(IC)环境中的有效性和可靠性。采用德尔菲技术,由一个由11名专家组成的小组来确定BKAT的内容效度。德尔菲过程产生了一个包含105个问题的测试。这些问题包括49个原始BKAT问题、25个略有修改的原始BKAT问题、3个有重大修改的原始BKAT问题和28个新问题。采用标准组设计来确定修改后测试的信度和决策效度。使用项目难度和项目区分指数进行项目分析。该修改后的测试由14名无IC经验的注册护士、18名有中级IC经验的注册护士和25名具备重症监护专科资质的注册护士完成。各相应组测试的平均得分(及标准差)分别为41(9)、69(9)和86(7)。这些结果有显著差异(p<0.001)。信度通过克朗巴哈α系数0.96得以确立。修改后的测试是对IC基础知识的可靠且有效的衡量工具,可作为评估IC入职培训项目的有价值辅助手段。