Pearson L J
Nurse Pract. 1996 Jan;21(1):10-70.
The change from a free-for-service system to a system run by managed-care organizations has caused dramatic shifts in where and how health care is delivered. Within the managed-care systems, administrators need to show a good bottom line. Rapid restructuring of the system and the need for profit create many potential consequences (e.g., APNs squeezed out of participation on some provider panels; previously unattractive poor patients are now attractive because they can provide an ongoing revenue base; the use of more unlicensed personnel to provide patient services). Private businesses and the federal government like managed-care health care systems as an answer to the out-of-control escalating costs of health care. Managed care is likely to stay with us for a long while. Because political force comes from money and there is plenty of that in health care insurance corporations, managed care is likely to be with us for a long time. Regulations and control of these managed-care systems will probably be difficult. However, though big business has the money, APNs have the feet, hands and patience to seek further regulation of these huge corporations (e.g., antidiscrimination language to prevent exclusion from provider panels). With the reality of managed care, MDs are no longer in control of the health care system. The AMA's recent attempt to control other providers is tantamount to one ship officer attempting to control another on the Titanic's (i.e., fee-for-service system's) last evening. In a few states, fee-for-service is still predominant, but the majority of states are rapidly moving into megaconglomerate, finance-driven managed care run by business administrators. Things are getting so complex in today's world of corporate takeovers, managed-care megaconglomerates, and power-brokering politics that it is easy to understand why millions of Americans drown themselves in relatively simplistic good-versus-evil entertainment dramas. Huge changes in how the system operates have happened this year while the nation was busy following the Simpson trial. But NPs and other APNs must be very vigilant. We must ensure a place in this new system. Our patients and the nation need us!
从免费服务系统向由管理式医疗组织运营的系统转变,已导致医疗服务的提供地点和方式发生了巨大变化。在管理式医疗系统中,管理人员需要展现出良好的财务状况。系统的快速重组以及对利润的需求产生了许多潜在后果(例如,一些医疗服务提供小组不再允许高级实践护士参与;以前不被看好的贫困患者现在变得有吸引力了,因为他们能提供持续的收入来源;使用更多无执照人员提供患者服务)。私营企业和联邦政府青睐管理式医疗系统,认为它是解决医疗费用失控飙升问题的答案。管理式医疗很可能会伴随我们很长一段时间。由于政治力量源于金钱,而医疗保险行业资金雄厚,管理式医疗可能会长期存在。对这些管理式医疗系统进行监管和控制可能会很困难。然而,尽管大企业有钱,但高级实践护士有行动能力、有手段且有耐心去寻求对这些大公司的进一步监管(例如,加入反歧视条款以防止被排除在医疗服务提供小组之外)。随着管理式医疗成为现实,医生已不再能掌控医疗系统。美国医学协会最近试图控制其他医疗服务提供者,这无异于泰坦尼克号(即收费服务系统)最后一晚一名船员试图去控制另一名船员。在少数几个州,收费服务仍然占主导地位,但大多数州正迅速转向由企业管理人员运营的大型联合企业、金融驱动的管理式医疗模式。在当今企业收购、管理式医疗大型联合企业以及权力交易政治的复杂世界里,很容易理解为什么数以百万计的美国人沉迷于相对简单的善恶娱乐剧之中。今年,当全国民众都在忙于关注辛普森案审判时,医疗系统的运作方式发生了巨大变化。但执业护士和其他高级实践护士必须保持高度警惕。我们必须在这个新系统中确保有一席之地。我们的患者和国家都需要我们!