Fan F, Tao Q, Abood M, Martin B R
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298-613, USA.
Brain Res. 1996 Jan 8;706(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01113-7.
The objective of this study was to determine whether the development of tolerance to CP 55,940, a potent cannabinoid agonist, was due to changes in the receptor or second messenger system. ICR mice treated with CP 55,940 (2 mg/kg) twice a day for 6 and one-half days developed a high degree of tolerance to the pharmacological effects of CP 55,940. The ability of CP 55,940 to produce motor hypoactivity, hypothermia and immobility was reduced 163-, 97- and 19-fold, respectively. Evaluation of 3H-CP 55,940 binding to rat brain membranes indicated no difference in receptor affinity between the vehicle- and CP 55,940-treated animals. However, these binding studies revealed a 50% decrease in receptor number in the cerebellum of the CP 55,940-tolerant mice. Although cAMP is generally considered to be the second messenger for cannabinoid receptors, little difference was observed in the inhibitory effects of CP 55,940 on adenylyl cyclase activity in cerebellum between vehicle and drug-treated mice. However, there was an increase in receptor mRNA which suggests a compensation for receptor loss. There are several possible explanation for these results. There may be sufficient spare receptors such that CP 55,940-tolerant mice are capable of producing a maximal effect on the second messenger system. On the other hand, one could conclude that cannabinoid receptor down-regulation does not account for the development of tolerance to all of the effects of CP 55,940 in mice.
本研究的目的是确定对强效大麻素激动剂CP 55,940产生耐受性是否是由于受体或第二信使系统的变化。用CP 55,940(2毫克/千克)每天两次处理6.5天的ICR小鼠对CP 55,940的药理作用产生了高度耐受性。CP 55,940产生运动活动减退、体温过低和不动的能力分别降低了163倍、97倍和19倍。对大鼠脑膜进行3H-CP 55,940结合评估表明,溶剂处理组和CP 55,940处理组动物之间的受体亲和力没有差异。然而,这些结合研究显示,CP 55,940耐受性小鼠小脑的受体数量减少了50%。虽然cAMP通常被认为是大麻素受体的第二信使,但在溶剂处理组和药物处理组小鼠的小脑中,CP 55,940对腺苷酸环化酶活性的抑制作用几乎没有差异。然而,受体mRNA有所增加,这表明对受体损失有补偿作用。对于这些结果有几种可能的解释。可能存在足够的备用受体,使得CP 55,940耐受性小鼠能够对第二信使系统产生最大效应。另一方面,可以得出结论,大麻素受体下调并不能解释小鼠对CP 55,940所有效应产生耐受性的原因。