Scholten A N, Griep C, Davelaar J, Chin A, Leer J W
Academisch Ziekenhuis, afd. Klinische Oncologie, Leiden.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1996 Feb 24;140(8):428-31.
To compare recurrence rates and cosmetic results after electron beam therapy versus superficial X-ray therapy for basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin.
Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Leiden, the Netherlands.
Retrospective.
A retrospective analysis was performed of 389 histologically confirmed basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin (1980-1990), treated with either superficial X-rays or electron beam therapy, with regard to local recurrence rates and cosmetics scored with an arbitrary three point scale.
Of 389 patients 19 developed a local recurrence (4.9%). For small tumours (irradiated surfaces < or = 10 cm2) a local recurrence rate of 2.2% was observed, both after electron beam therapy and after superficial X-ray therapy. Large tumours (irradiated surface > 50 cm2, treated with electron beam) had a higher recurrence rate (13.8%) as had tumours which had been treated before. The cosmetic results with electron beam treatment were better, because smaller fractions were used compared with superficial X-ray treatment.
In our hands electron beam treatment was not inferior to superficial X-ray treatment, cosmetically even better and also applicable in case of larger tumours. The inferior results of electron beam therapy reported in literature may be due to technical factors.
比较电子束疗法与浅表X线疗法治疗皮肤基底细胞癌和鳞状细胞癌后的复发率及美容效果。
荷兰莱顿大学医学中心放疗科。
回顾性研究。
对1980年至1990年间经组织学确诊的389例皮肤基底细胞癌和鳞状细胞癌患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者接受了浅表X线或电子束疗法治疗,评估局部复发率,并采用任意三分制对美容效果进行评分。
389例患者中有19例出现局部复发(4.9%)。对于小肿瘤(照射面积≤10 cm²),电子束疗法和浅表X线疗法后的局部复发率均为2.2%。大肿瘤(照射面积>50 cm²,采用电子束治疗)的复发率较高(13.8%),既往接受过治疗的肿瘤复发率也较高。电子束治疗后的美容效果更好,因为与浅表X线治疗相比采用的分次剂量更小。
在我们的研究中,电子束治疗在美容效果上不逊色于浅表X线治疗,甚至更好,且可用于较大肿瘤的治疗。文献报道的电子束疗法较差的结果可能归因于技术因素。