• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

防御性医疗与侵权法改革:旧瓶装新酒

Defensive medicine and tort reform: new evidence in an old bottle.

作者信息

Bovbjerg R R, Dubay L C, Kenney G M, Norton S A

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Summer;21(2):267-88. doi: 10.1215/03616878-21-2-267.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-21-2-267
PMID:8723178
Abstract

Quantitative analysis of medical liability's influence on medical practice is a small but growing field. The three foregoing articles illustrate three of the possible analytic approaches: case study of technological diffusion, survey of physician responses to detailed clinical scenarios, and multivariate analysis of the relation of physicians' scenario responses to objective liability experience. The articles also offer a good picture of the state of the art: Many difficulties hamper research in this area, and these articles, like others, offer considerable illumination but leave much uncovered. Defensive medicine surely exists, but its effects on health care spending and access are unclear. The most important lessons for public policy are that tort reform may be necessary but not sufficient to reduce the problems associated with defensive medicine, and that the major malpractice problem continues to be malpractice.

摘要

对医疗责任对医疗实践影响的定量分析是一个规模虽小但不断发展的领域。上述三篇文章阐述了三种可能的分析方法:技术传播的案例研究、医生对详细临床情景反应的调查,以及医生情景反应与客观责任经历关系的多变量分析。这些文章还很好地展现了当前的技术水平:该领域的研究面临诸多困难,这些文章与其他文章一样,虽提供了相当多的启示,但仍有许多未涉及的内容。防御性医疗肯定存在,但其对医疗保健支出和可及性的影响尚不清楚。对公共政策而言,最重要的教训是侵权法改革可能有必要,但不足以减少与防御性医疗相关的问题,而且主要的医疗事故问题仍然是医疗事故。

相似文献

1
Defensive medicine and tort reform: new evidence in an old bottle.防御性医疗与侵权法改革:旧瓶装新酒
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Summer;21(2):267-88. doi: 10.1215/03616878-21-2-267.
2
Evaluating the medical malpractice system and options for reform.评估医疗事故制度和改革方案。
J Econ Perspect. 2011 Spring;25(2):93-110. doi: 10.1257/jep.25.2.93.
3
Beyond caps: EMTALA and fundamental tort reform.
Tenn Med. 2010 Apr;103(4):9-10.
4
Health care reformation and the need for tort reform.医疗保健改革与侵权法改革的必要性。
N J Med. 1995 May;92(5):329-32.
5
Controlling defensive medical practices and costs through state health policy reform.通过州卫生政策改革控制防御性医疗行为及成本。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1996 Fall;19(2):163-81.
6
How much does defensive medicine cost?防御性医疗的成本是多少?
J Am Health Policy. 1994 Jul-Aug;4(4):7-15.
7
Rethinking the Obvious: Time for New Ideas on Medical Malpractice Tort Reform.重新审视显而易见之事:是时候提出医疗事故侵权改革的新想法了。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2019 Apr/Jun;38(2):109-115. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000260.
8
Diagnostic imaging rates for head injury in the ED and states' medical malpractice tort reforms.急诊室头部创伤的诊断成像率与各州的医疗事故侵权改革。
Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;29(6):656-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.01.038. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
9
Low costs of defensive medicine, small savings from tort reform.防御性医疗成本低,侵权改革节省少。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1578-84. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0146.
10
Defensive medicine, cost containment, and reform.防御性医疗、成本控制和改革。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 May;25(5):470-3. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1259-3. Epub 2010 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of physician malpractice claims rates with admissions for low-risk chest pain.医生医疗事故索赔率与低风险胸痛住院情况的关联
Am J Med Open. 2023 Mar 26;9:100041. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100041. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Defensive healthcare practice: systematic review of qualitative evidence.防御性医疗实践:定性证据的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 18;14(7):e085673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085673.
3
The importance of negative defensive medicine in the effects of malpractice reform.消极防御性医疗行为在医疗事故改革效果中的重要性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Apr;17(3):355-69. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0687-8. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
4
The Welfare Effects of Medical Malpractice Liability.医疗事故责任的福利效应
Int Rev Law Econ. 2012 Dec;32(4):356-369. doi: 10.1016/j.irle.2012.07.003.
5
Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.诉讼会影响医疗行为吗?社区放射科医生的医疗事故认知和经验对乳腺钼靶筛查的影响。
Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):37-46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2361040512.
6
International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs.社区项目中乳腺钼靶筛查解读的国际差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Sep 17;95(18):1384-93. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg048.